Calxeda ECX-1000 vs. Ampere eMAG Archived tests from a Calxeda ECX-1000 node tested at Calxeda HQ in late 2012 by Michael Larabel. Compared to current performance of Ampere eMAG. Benchmarks for a future article on Phoronix.com.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1810097-SK-AMPERECAL19 .
Calxeda ECX-1000 vs. Ampere eMAG Processor Motherboard Memory Disk Chipset Graphics Network OS Kernel Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY ARMv7 rev 0 (4 Cores) Highbank 4096MB 256GB SAMSUNG MZ7PC256 Ubuntu 12.04 3.2.0-1000-highbank (armv7l) GCC 4.6 ext4 Ampere eMAG ARMv8 @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores) AmpereComputing OSPREY (4.8.19 BIOS) Applied Micro Circuits X-Gene 8 x 16384 MB DDR4-2400MHz Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CTD 256GB Samsung SSD 860 ASPEED ASPEED Family Intel I210 Gigabit Connection CentOS 7.5.1804 4.14.0-49.el7.centos.180925+amp.ilp32.aarch64 (aarch64) 20180926 GCC 6.0.0 20150826 xfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - Calxeda ECX-1000: --build=arm-linux-gnueabihf --disable-sjlj-exceptions --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=arm-linux-gnueabihf --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=hard --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb -v - Ampere eMAG OSPREY: --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --disable-libmudflap --disable-libquadmath --disable-libsanitizer --disable-libssp --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc --enable-multilib --enable-shared --host=aarch64-apm-linux-gnu --target=aarch64-apm-linux-gnu --with-abi=lp64 --with-build-sysroot=/home/bhuber/sandbox/gcc/toolchain-build-scripts/buildroot/9.0.7-le/install/opt/apm-aarch64/9.0.7-le/bin/../aarch64-apm-linux-gnu/libc --with-cpu=xgene1 --with-multilib-list=lp64,ilp32 --with-plugin-ld=ld System Details - Calxeda ECX-1000: Python 2.7.3. Processor Details - Ampere eMAG OSPREY: Scaling Governor: cppc_cpufreq performance Python Details - Ampere eMAG OSPREY: Python 2.7.5
Calxeda ECX-1000 vs. Ampere eMAG npb: BT.A npb: LU.A npb: SP.A mafft: Multiple Sequence Alignment c-ray: Total Time pybench: Total For Average Test Times phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite stream: Copy stream: Add himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 740 654 417 52.58 566.45 17683 10152 1498 1621 132 37412 26390 16756 3.91 9.00 4765 48612 70635 71747 772 OpenBenchmarking.org
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: BT.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: BT.A Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 13.85, N = 3 SE +/- 35.08, N = 3 740 37412 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -fopenmp
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: LU.A Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 11.01, N = 4 SE +/- 210.39, N = 3 654 26390 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -fopenmp
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: SP.A Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 SE +/- 167.40, N = 12 417 16756 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -fopenmp
Timed MAFFT Alignment Multiple Sequence Alignment OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 9 52.58 3.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -lpthread
C-Ray Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 566.45 9.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2008-08-14 Total For Average Test Times Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 4.00, N = 3 SE +/- 4.70, N = 3 17683 4765
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 71.90, N = 3 SE +/- 86.85, N = 3 10152 48612
Stream Type: Copy OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Copy Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 2.67, N = 10 SE +/- 100.37, N = 10 1498 70635 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fopenmp
Stream Type: Add OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Add Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 2.74, N = 10 SE +/- 269.32, N = 10 1621 71747 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fopenmp
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver Calxeda ECX-1000 Ampere eMAG OSPREY 170 340 510 680 850 SE +/- 1.91, N = 3 SE +/- 21.36, N = 12 132 772 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4