sep-2018-cpu-oc375-mem3000 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core testing with a MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8192MB on LinuxMint 19 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Family 17h, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 6001GB Western Digital WD60EFRX-68M + 5 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO 2TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8192MB (1721/5005MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: SAMSUNG, Network: Intel I211 Gigabit Connection + Intel Wireless-AC 9260 OS: LinuxMint 19, Kernel: 4.15.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 3.8.9, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.48, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Push/Pull fans: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core @ 3.44GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Family 17h, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 6001GB Western Digital WD60EFRX-68M + 5 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO 2TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8192MB (1721/5005MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: SAMSUNG, Network: Intel I211 Gigabit Connection + Intel Wireless-AC 9260 OS: LinuxMint 19, Kernel: 4.15.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 3.8.9, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.48, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 2602.04 |============================== Push/Pull fans ........................ 2601.55 |============================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 25518.90 |============================= Push/Pull fans ........................ 25492.26 |============================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 26962.54 |============================= Push/Pull fans ........................ 26950.64 |============================= Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 6687064 |============================== Push/Pull fans ........................ 6646677 |============================== x264 2018-07-28 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 166.93 |============================== Push/Pull fans ........................ 172.70 |=============================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 116276 |=============================== Push/Pull fans ........................ 117315 |=============================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 30.93 |================================ Push/Pull fans ........................ 30.82 |================================ C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 25.01 |================================ Push/Pull fans ........................ 21.49 |=========================== AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 44.24 |================================ Push/Pull fans ........................ 44.24 |================================ Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 38.89 |================================ Push/Pull fans ........................ 38.85 |================================ FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core . 6.52 |================================= Push/Pull fans ........................ 6.52 |================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 58.94 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 1.47 |======================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 12.61 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 264.06 |====================================================== Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 23.29 |======================================================= Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 10.07 |======================================================= Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 25.70 |======================================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 2.55 |======================================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 63.46 |======================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Push/Pull fans . 483.16 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Push/Pull fans . 124.20 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Push/Pull fans . 218.75 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Push/Pull fans . 624.65 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Push/Pull fans . 386.22 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Push/Pull fans . 1061.96 |===================================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Push/Pull fans . 76711949 |==================================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Push/Pull fans . 649583050 |=================================================== Primesieve 7.1 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 7.52 |======================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 12.37 |======================================================= m-queens 1.1 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 22.69 |======================================================= N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 3.84 |======================================================== R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 0.7376 |====================================================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 15.55 |======================================================= System BZIP2 Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 11.20 |======================================================= System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 4.34 |======================================================== PSSTOP Memory test kb < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 852663 |====================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 1 MB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 589 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 2 MB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 1887 |======================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 3 MB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 2833 |======================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 5 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 8 |=========================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 50 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 30 |========================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 100 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 105 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 112 MB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 83135 |======================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 150 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 88 |========================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 200 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 122 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 250 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 142 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 300 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 181 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 350 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 203 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 400 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 371 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 450 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 259 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 500 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 462 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 550 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 311 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 600 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 556 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 650 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 377 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 700 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 397 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 750 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 438 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 800 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 460 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 850 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 775 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 900 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 536 |========================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 950 KB ms < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 543 |========================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 8.34 |======================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 71.97 |======================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 70.40 |======================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 75.54 |======================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Push/Pull fans . 85.25 |=======================================================