2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 testing with a HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS) and Matrox s MGA G200EH on RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1808079-AR-1808075AR54
sim206
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 testing with a HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS) and Matrox s MGA G200EH on RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 259072MB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe
OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6, Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.15.0, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313 + PGI Compiler + PGI C-C++ Workstation, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
2:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 259072MB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe
OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6, Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.15.0, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313 + PGI Compiler + PGI C-C++ Workstation, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
3:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 259072MB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe
OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6, Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.15.0, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313 + PGI Compiler + PGI C-C++ Workstation, File-System: nfs
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 535.33 |===========================================================
2 . 534.15 |===========================================================
3 . 606.15 |===================================================================
Crafty 25.2
Elapsed Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 6378055 |=======================================================
2 . 6368651 |=======================================================
3 . 7637423 |==================================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 71815.48 |============================================
2 . 71836.62 |============================================
3 . 103876.75 |================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 985.81 |==============================================================
2 . 980.61 |==============================================================
3 . 1047.56 |==================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 744.19 |======================================================
2 . 744.19 |======================================================
3 . 915.33 |===================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 561.10 |========================================================
2 . 560.07 |========================================================
3 . 673.68 |===================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 276.01 |===================================================================
2 . 276.31 |===================================================================
3 . 269.10 |=================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 109.57 |===========================================================
2 . 109.57 |===========================================================
3 . 125.05 |===================================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 80910.68 |==========================================
2 . 80954.70 |==========================================
3 . 122393.52 |================================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 81221.10 |==============================================
2 . 81045.66 |==============================================
3 . 113639.26 |================================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 71233.48 |==============================================
2 . 71237.90 |==============================================
3 . 100059.22 |================================================================