sim206 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 testing with a HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS) and Matrox s MGA G200EH on RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2133MHz 752370-091, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6, Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.15.0, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 5: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (24 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2133MHz 752370-091, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200EH, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit PCIe OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.6, Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.15.0, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.0, Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 71937.06 |================================================================= 5 . 70337.00 |================================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 71503.92 |================================================================= 5 . 69951.22 |================================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 81235.14 |================================================================= 5 . 79650.82 |================================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 81013.82 |================================================================= 5 . 79044.96 |=============================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6398037 |================================================================== 5 . 6399160 |================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 5 . 535.13 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better 5 . 109.42 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better 5 . 276.31 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better 5 . 560.59 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better 5 . 743.49 |=================================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better 5 . 985.81 |===================================================================