AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB on Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1806172-AR-WINDOWSSE91
Windows Server 2016
AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB on Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Windows Server 2016:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00, Memory: 8 x 4096 MB 2666MHz 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1, Disk: 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB + 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB (1506/3505MHz), Network: Realtek PCIe GBE Family + Microsoft ISATAP
OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 391.35 (23.21.13.9135), Vulkan: 1.0.65, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO:
Processor: AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00, Memory: 7 x 4096 MB 2667MHz 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1, Disk: 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB + 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB (1506/3505MHz), Network: Realtek PCIe GBE Family + Microsoft ISATAP
OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 391.35 (23.21.13.9135), Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
SQLite 3.22
Timed SQLite Insertions
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 ....... 136.83 |===========================================
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 88.32 |============================
m-queens 1.1
Time To Solve
Seconds < Lower Is Better
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 45.47 |============================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 331.43 |===========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 160.95 |===========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 184.51 |===========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 161.71 |===========================================
OSBench
Test: Memory Allocations
Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 217.98 |=================================================
OSBench
Test: Launch Programs
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 1244352.00 |=============================================
OSBench
Test: Create Threads
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 74.92 |==================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Files
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 2587.78 |================================================
Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 2.07 |===================================================
Git
Time To Complete Common Git Commands
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 30.30 |==================================================
NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 653.24 |=================================================
PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 3174 |===================================================
WinSAT
Test: Memory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 60022.43 |===============================================
Redis 3.2.1
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 333639.94 |==============================================
Redis 3.2.1
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 247213.98 |==============================================
GIMP 2.9.8
Test: unsharp-mask
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 60.26 |==================================================
GIMP 2.9.8
Test: auto-levels
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 50.53 |==================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 229.94 |=================================================
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Interpreter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 0.06335471 |=============================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: garbage
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 1573706 |================================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: json
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 6336602 |================================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: http
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 33509 |==================================================
Netperf 2.7.0
Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 60 Seconds
Megabits/sec Throughput > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 959.77 |=================================================
Netperf 2.7.0
Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Server To Client - Duration: 60 Seconds
Megabits/sec Throughput > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 947.57 |=================================================
Netperf 2.7.0
Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Client To Server - Duration: 60 Seconds
Megabits/sec Throughput > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 789.14 |=================================================
Netperf 2.7.0
Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Request Response - Duration: 60 Seconds
Transaction Rate Per Second > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 766.44 |=================================================
Netperf 2.7.0
Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Request Response - Duration: 60 Seconds
Transaction Rate Per Second > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 771.63 |=================================================
BlogBench 1.0
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 104 |====================================================
BlogBench 1.0
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 3785 |===================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 209621.62 |==============================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 818.83 |=================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 54372.18 |===============================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 212.39 |=================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 35776.52 |===============================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 139.75 |=================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 12265.02 |===============================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 47.91 |==================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 3541.98 |================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 13.84 |==================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 1838.50 |================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 7.18 |===================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 7029.45 |================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 27.46 |==================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 1912.27 |================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 7.47 |===================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 969.94 |=================================================
Diskspd 2.0.17
Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KB
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 3.79 |===================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 30933 |==================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 121 |====================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 31267 |==================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 122 |====================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 30267 |==================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 119 |====================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 178 |====================================================
Crafty 25.2
Elapsed Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 2973169 |==========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 90.97 |============================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO . 40.69 |============================================
WinSAT
Test: Disk
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 85.64 |==================================================
Redis 3.2.1
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 333724.17 |==============================================
Redis 3.2.1
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 302389.51 |==============================================
Redis 3.2.1
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 446893.06 |==============================================
GIMP 2.9.8
Test: resize
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 49.27 |==================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 3383.15 |================================================
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Pod2html
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 0.74812335 |=============================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 665.94 |=================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 1892.62 |================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 1116.25 |================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 737.38 |=================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 702.34 |=================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 1053.86 |================================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: build
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 76247908483 |============================================
IOzone 3.465
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 306.75 |=================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Windows Server 2016 . 45550 |==================================================