Windows Server 2016

AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB on Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1806172-AR-WINDOWSSE91
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 3 Tests
CPU Massive 7 Tests
Database Test Suite 2 Tests
Disk Test Suite 3 Tests
Java 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Server 5 Tests
Server CPU Tests 3 Tests
Single-Threaded 6 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per RAM Channel Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows Server 2016
March 27 2018
 
466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO
June 17 2018
  15 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  8 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Windows Server 2016ProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay DriverVulkanFile-SystemScreen ResolutionCompilerWindows Server 2016466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVOAMD EPYC 7551 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-008 x 4096 MB 2666MHz 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GB + 466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB (1506/3505MHz)Realtek PCIe GBE Family + Microsoft ISATAPMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 1439310.0 (x86_64)391.35 (23.21.13.9135)1.0.65NTFS1920x10807 x 4096 MB 2667MHz 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1GCC 7.1.03840x2160OpenBenchmarking.orgPython Details- Windows Server 2016: Python 2.7.14

Windows Server 2016sqlite: Timed SQLite Insertionsfio: Rand Read - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Write - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Read - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Write - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directorydiskspd: 1 - 100 - All Writes - 1M - 4KBdiskspd: 2 - 100 - All Writes - 1M - 4KBdiskspd: 8 - 100 - All Writes - 1M - 4KBdiskspd: 1 - 50 - 1M - 4KBdiskspd: 2 - 50 - 1M - 4KBdiskspd: 8 - 50 - 1M - 4KBdiskspd: 1 - 0 - Read Only - 1M - 4KBdiskspd: 2 - 0 - Read Only - 1M - 4KBdiskspd: 8 - 0 - Read Only - 1M - 4KBblogbench: Readblogbench: Writeiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performancenetperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Request Response - 60 Secondsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - UDP Request Response - 60 Secondsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Stream - Client To Server - 60 Secondsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Stream - Server To Client - 60 Secondsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - 60 Secondsgo-benchmark: httpgo-benchmark: jsongo-benchmark: buildgo-benchmark: garbagejava-scimark2: Compositejava-scimark2: Monte Carlojava-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transformjava-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyjava-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationjava-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationperl-benchmark: Pod2htmlperl-benchmark: Interpreterpgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Onlypgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Writegimp: resizegimp: auto-levelsgimp: unsharp-maskredis: LPOPredis: SADDredis: LPUSHredis: GETredis: SETwinsat: Diskwinsat: Memorypybench: Total For Average Test Timesnginx: Static Web Page Servinggit: Time To Complete Common Git Commandssunflow: Global Illumination + Image Synthesisosbench: Create Filesosbench: Create Threadsosbench: Launch Programsosbench: Memory Allocationsscimark2: Compositescimark2: Monte Carloscimark2: Fast Fourier Transformscimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyscimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationscimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationcrafty: Elapsed Timem-queens: Time To SolveWindows Server 2016466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO136.831781191221213.797.4727.467.1813.8447.91139.75212.39818.833785104306.75771.63766.44789.14947.57959.773350963366027624790848315737061053.86702.34737.381116.251892.62665.940.748123350.063354713383.15229.9449.2750.5360.26446893.06247213.98302389.51333639.94333724.1785.6460022.433174653.2430.302.072587.7874.921244352.00217.9888.32161.7140.6990.97184.51160.95331.43297316945.47OpenBenchmarking.org

SQLite

This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.22Timed SQLite InsertionsWindows Server 2016466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO306090120150SE +/- 1.14, N = 3SE +/- 1.41, N = 3136.8388.32
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.22Timed SQLite InsertionsWindows Server 2016466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO306090120150Min: 134.57 / Avg: 136.83 / Max: 138.13Min: 86.54 / Avg: 88.32 / Max: 91.11

Flexible IO Tester

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 20164080120160200SE +/- 4.35, N = 6178

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 201610K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 1124.80, N = 645550

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016306090120150SE +/- 1.86, N = 3119

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 20166K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 751.30, N = 330267

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016306090120150SE +/- 1.53, N = 3122

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 20167K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 384.42, N = 331267

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016306090120150SE +/- 1.97, N = 6121

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 20167K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 491.71, N = 630933

Diskspd

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 20160.85281.70562.55843.41124.264SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.79

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 0.04, N = 3969.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016246810SE +/- 0.03, N = 37.47

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016400800120016002000SE +/- 8.24, N = 31912.27

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 327.46

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 100 - All Writes - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 201615003000450060007500SE +/- 7.54, N = 37029.45

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 37.18

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016400800120016002000SE +/- 1.62, N = 31838.50

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 201648121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 313.84

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 20168001600240032004000SE +/- 2.62, N = 33541.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 20161122334455SE +/- 0.06, N = 347.91

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 20163K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 16.61, N = 312265.02

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016306090120150SE +/- 0.25, N = 3139.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 20168K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 63.68, N = 335776.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 201650100150200250SE +/- 0.65, N = 3212.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 2 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 201612K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 164.98, N = 354372.18

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 0.66, N = 3818.83

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 8 - Write Requests (Percent): 0 - Read Only - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 201640K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 169.10, N = 3209621.62

BlogBench

BlogBench is designed to replicate the load of a real-world busy file server by stressing the file-system with multiple threads of random reads, writes, and rewrites. The behavior is mimicked of that of a blog by creating blogs with content and pictures, modifying blog posts, adding comments to these blogs, and then reading the content of the blogs. All of these blogs generated are created locally with fake content and pictures. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.0Test: ReadWindows Server 20168001600240032004000SE +/- 51.70, N = 33785

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.0Test: WriteWindows Server 201620406080100SE +/- 1.20, N = 3104

IOzone

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceWindows Server 201670140210280350SE +/- 21.19, N = 6306.75

Netperf

Netperf is a network bandwidth testing software. This test profile is used for automated testing of a netperf client and requires you have access to a netperf server. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTransaction Rate Per Second, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Request Response - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016170340510680850SE +/- 1.65, N = 3771.63

OpenBenchmarking.orgTransaction Rate Per Second, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Request Response - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016170340510680850SE +/- 5.91, N = 3766.44

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Client To Server - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 0.06, N = 3789.14

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Server To Client - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 0.01, N = 3947.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 0.05, N = 3959.77

Go Benchmarks

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: httpWindows Server 20167K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 59.25, N = 333509

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonWindows Server 20161.4M2.8M4.2M5.6M7MSE +/- 30959.10, N = 36336602

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildWindows Server 201616000M32000M48000M64000M80000MSE +/- 2294397706.29, N = 676247908483

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: garbageWindows Server 2016300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 7656.60, N = 31573706

Java SciMark

This test runs the Java version of SciMark 2.0, which is a benchmark for scientific and numerical computing developed by programmers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This benchmark is made up of Fast Foruier Transform, Jacobi Successive Over-relaxation, Monte Carlo, Sparse Matrix Multiply, and dense LU matrix factorization benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeWindows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 49.32, N = 81053.86

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloWindows Server 2016150300450600750SE +/- 41.42, N = 4702.34

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformWindows Server 2016160320480640800SE +/- 116.90, N = 4737.38

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyWindows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 148.44, N = 41116.25

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationWindows Server 2016400800120016002000SE +/- 220.18, N = 41892.62

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationWindows Server 2016140280420560700SE +/- 87.67, N = 4665.94

Perl Benchmarks

Perl benchmark suite that can be used to compare the relative speed of different versions of perl. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlWindows Server 20160.16830.33660.50490.67320.8415SE +/- 0.14655894, N = 60.74812335

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterWindows Server 20160.01430.02860.04290.05720.0715SE +/- 0.00046299, N = 30.06335471

PostgreSQL pgbench

This is a simple benchmark of PostgreSQL using pgbench. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 10.3Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read OnlyWindows Server 20167001400210028003500SE +/- 304.65, N = 63383.15

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 10.3Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read WriteWindows Server 201650100150200250SE +/- 0.56, N = 3229.94

GIMP

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.9.8Test: resizeWindows Server 20161122334455SE +/- 1.48, N = 649.27

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.9.8Test: auto-levelsWindows Server 20161122334455SE +/- 0.97, N = 650.53

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.9.8Test: unsharp-maskWindows Server 20161326395265SE +/- 0.90, N = 660.26

Redis

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: LPOPWindows Server 2016100K200K300K400K500KSE +/- 46903.29, N = 6446893.06

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: SADDWindows Server 201650K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 400.55, N = 3247213.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: LPUSHWindows Server 201660K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 33345.59, N = 6302389.51

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: GETWindows Server 201670K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 2793.01, N = 3333639.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: SETWindows Server 201670K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 41697.14, N = 6333724.17

WinSAT

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterWinSATTest: DiskWindows Server 201620406080100SE +/- 3.53, N = 685.64MIN: 72.19 / MAX: 98.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterWinSATTest: MemoryWindows Server 201613K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 32.86, N = 360022.43MIN: 59956.77 / MAX: 60057.41

PyBench

This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test TimesWindows Server 20167001400210028003500SE +/- 4.04, N = 33174

NGINX Benchmark

This is a test of ab, which is the Apache Benchmark program running against nginx. This test profile measures how many requests per second a given system can sustain when carrying out 2,000,000 requests with 500 requests being carried out concurrently. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterNGINX Benchmark 1.9.9Static Web Page ServingWindows Server 2016140280420560700SE +/- 14.05, N = 6653.24

Git

This test measures the time needed to carry out some sample Git operations on an example, static repository that happens to be a copy of the GNOME GTK tool-kit repository. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGitTime To Complete Common Git CommandsWindows Server 2016714212835SE +/- 0.63, N = 630.301. git version 2.16.2.windows.1

Sunflow Rendering System

This test runs benchmarks of the Sunflow Rendering System. The Sunflow Rendering System is an open-source render engine for photo-realistic image synthesis with a ray-tracing core. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSunflow Rendering System 0.07.2Global Illumination + Image SynthesisWindows Server 20160.46580.93161.39741.86322.329SE +/- 0.03, N = 32.07

OSBench

OSBench is a collection of micro-benchmarks for measuring operating system primitives like time to create threads/processes, launching programs, creating files, and memory allocation. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create FilesWindows Server 20166001200180024003000SE +/- 13.20, N = 32587.78

OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create ThreadsWindows Server 201620406080100SE +/- 0.32, N = 374.92

OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Launch ProgramsWindows Server 2016300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 13208.02, N = 31244352.00

OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Memory AllocationsWindows Server 201650100150200250SE +/- 3.98, N = 6217.98

SciMark

This test runs the ANSI C version of SciMark 2.0, which is a benchmark for scientific and numerical computing developed by programmers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This test is made up of Fast Foruier Transform, Jacobi Successive Over-relaxation, Monte Carlo, Sparse Matrix Multiply, and dense LU matrix factorization benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Composite466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO4080120160200SE +/- 0.45, N = 3161.71

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte Carlo466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO918273645SE +/- 2.22, N = 340.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO20406080100SE +/- 6.31, N = 390.97

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO4080120160200SE +/- 2.23, N = 3184.51

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO4080120160200SE +/- 3.53, N = 3160.95

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO70140210280350SE +/- 2.56, N = 3331.43

Crafty

This is a performance test of Crafty, an advanced open-source chess engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed Time466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 120782.27, N = 62973169

m-queens

A solver for the N-queens problem with multi-threading support via the OpenMP library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterm-queens 1.1Time To Solve466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO1020304050SE +/- 0.12, N = 345.47