More Microsoft Windows 10 Benchmarks Intel Core i9-7980XE testing with a ASUS PRIME X299-A and AMD Radeon R9 Fury 4095MB on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 16299 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1803046-PTS-MOREMICR60 .
More Microsoft Windows 10 Benchmarks Processor Motherboard Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Driver OpenCL Vulkan Compiler Screen Resolution Windows 10 Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.59GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads) ASUS PRIME X299-A 4 x 4096 MB 3200MHz Corsair CMK16GX4M4C3200C16 238GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G8 AMD Radeon R9 Fury 4095MB Intel Connection I219-V Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 16299 10.0 (x86_64) 23.20.15017.3010 OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2527.8) 1.0.65 GCC 7.1.0Copyright 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org - python is not recognized as an internal or external command operable program or batch file.
More Microsoft Windows 10 Benchmarks paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160 j2dbench: Text Rendering j2dbench: Image Rendering j2dbench: All Rendering Tests j2dbench: Vector Graphics Rendering go-benchmark: http go-benchmark: json go-benchmark: build go-benchmark: garbage java-scimark2: Composite java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation c-ray: Total Time perl-benchmark: Pod2html perl-benchmark: Interpreter tjbench: Decompression Throughput pgbench: Buffer Test - Normal Load - Read Only pgbench: Buffer Test - Normal Load - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Only pgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Heavy Contention - Read Only pgbench: Buffer Test - Heavy Contention - Read Write darktable: Boat - CPU-only darktable: Masskrug - CPU-only darktable: Server Room - CPU-only gimp: resize gimp: auto-levels gimp: unsharp-mask redis: LPOP redis: SADD redis: LPUSH redis: GET redis: SET blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only blender: Classroom - CPU-Only blender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Only blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only blender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only pybench: Total For Average Test Times nginx: Static Web Page Serving Windows 10 19.28 20.51 152.87 119.79 141.06 122.06 14637.34 6525866.21 3625540.65 2613525.86 6534 3313235 37288135767 696164 2425.50 1071.61 1456.89 2522.74 5392.78 1683.50 4.84 0.17067371 0.04908535 179.36 158788.65 2938.23 13325.30 843.19 146803.79 2460.40 0.74 0.89 0.88 19.14 18.42 26.71 1527667.71 1235747.80 967435.33 1537564.09 1170097.42 141.49 333.67 204.96 656.81 369.49 1736 738.57 OpenBenchmarking.org
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 10 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.28
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 10 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 6.31, N = 3 1932.29
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Windows 10 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.51
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Windows 10 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 2056.15
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 10 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.96, N = 6 152.87
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 10 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 63.42, N = 6 2445.89
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Windows 10 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.70, N = 6 119.79
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Windows 10 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 27.15, N = 6 1916.64
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 10 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.18, N = 5 141.06
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 10 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 22.68, N = 5 1469.95
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Windows 10 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 122.06
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Windows 10 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 16.80, N = 3 1272.04
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Text Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Text Rendering Windows 10 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 19.46, N = 4 14637.34
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Image Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Image Rendering Windows 10 1.4M 2.8M 4.2M 5.6M 7M SE +/- 7325.75, N = 4 6525866.21
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests Windows 10 800K 1600K 2400K 3200K 4000K SE +/- 11485.01, N = 4 3625540.65
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering Windows 10 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 6363.22, N = 4 2613525.86
Go Benchmarks Test: http OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: http Windows 10 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 100.17, N = 3 6534
Go Benchmarks Test: json OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: json Windows 10 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 14715.96, N = 3 3313235
Go Benchmarks Test: build OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: build Windows 10 8000M 16000M 24000M 32000M 40000M SE +/- 1209446745.37, N = 6 37288135767
Go Benchmarks Test: garbage OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Windows 10 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 1224.25, N = 3 696164
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Windows 10 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 3.97, N = 4 2425.50
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Windows 10 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.13, N = 4 1071.61
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Windows 10 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 12.44, N = 4 1456.89
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Windows 10 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 0.30, N = 4 2522.74
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Windows 10 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 31.22, N = 4 5392.78
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Windows 10 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.29, N = 4 1683.50
C-Ray Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Windows 10 1.089 2.178 3.267 4.356 5.445 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.84
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Windows 10 0.0384 0.0768 0.1152 0.1536 0.192 SE +/- 0.00015190, N = 3 0.17067371
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Windows 10 0.011 0.022 0.033 0.044 0.055 SE +/- 0.00028252, N = 3 0.04908535
libjpeg-turbo tjbench Test: Decompression Throughput OpenBenchmarking.org Megapixels/sec, More Is Better libjpeg-turbo tjbench 1.5.3 Test: Decompression Throughput Windows 10 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.11, N = 3 179.36
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only Windows 10 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1412.78, N = 3 158788.65
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write Windows 10 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 70.40, N = 6 2938.23
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only Windows 10 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 169.77, N = 3 13325.30
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write Windows 10 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 13.55, N = 3 843.19
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only Windows 10 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 586.95, N = 3 146803.79
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write Windows 10 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 93.71, N = 6 2460.40
Darktable Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Windows 10 0.1665 0.333 0.4995 0.666 0.8325 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 0.74
Darktable Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Windows 10 0.2003 0.4006 0.6009 0.8012 1.0015 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 0.89
Darktable Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Windows 10 0.198 0.396 0.594 0.792 0.99 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 0.88
GIMP Test: resize OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.9.8 Test: resize Windows 10 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.28, N = 5 19.14
GIMP Test: auto-levels OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.9.8 Test: auto-levels Windows 10 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 18.42
GIMP Test: unsharp-mask OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.9.8 Test: unsharp-mask Windows 10 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 26.71
Redis Test: LPOP OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: LPOP Windows 10 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 13882.31, N = 3 1527667.71
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: SADD Windows 10 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 2517.93, N = 3 1235747.80
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: LPUSH Windows 10 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1628.55, N = 3 967435.33
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: GET Windows 10 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 14856.27, N = 3 1537564.09
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 3.2.1 Test: SET Windows 10 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 10427.32, N = 3 1170097.42
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79a Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Windows 10 30 60 90 120 150 141.49
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79a Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Windows 10 70 140 210 280 350 333.67
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79a Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Windows 10 40 80 120 160 200 204.96
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79a Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Windows 10 140 280 420 560 700 656.81
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79a Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Windows 10 80 160 240 320 400 369.49
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Windows 10 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 1736
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Windows 10 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 9.72, N = 3 738.57
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4