tests Intel Core i7-2620M testing with a LENOVO 4286CTO and Intel HD 3000 on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. x220, performane: Processor: Intel Core i7-2620M @ 3.40GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO 4286CTO, Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 240GB KINGSTON SV300S3, Graphics: Intel HD 3000 (1300MHz), Audio: Conexant CX20590, Network: Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1000 OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-112-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE 4.14.16, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: intel 2.99.917, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 17.2.8, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1360x768 SQLite 3.22 Timed SQLite Insertions Seconds < Lower Is Better x220, performane . 4.58 |====================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better x220, performane . 8155.51 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better x220, performane . 85.17 |===================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better x220, performane . 12112.38 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better x220, performane . 12629.07 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better x220, performane . 12057.65 |================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better x220, performane . 12573.29 |================================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better x220, performane . 45.43 |===================================================== FFmpeg 3.4.1 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better x220, performane . 15.05 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better x220, performane . 243.16 |====================================================