tc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2

tc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1711135-TY-TC22RUN1C83
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
tc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2
November 13 2017
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


tc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (56 Cores)Nokia Solutions and s AO-F06G-AIntel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon7.875 x 32768 MB DDR4-2133MHz Samsung256GB Micron_M600_MTFD + 1000GB Seagate ST1000NM0033-9ZMASPEED ASPEED FamilyMellanox MT27710 FamilyOpenStack 7.43.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)GCC 4.8.5 20150623btrfs1024x768ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionTc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2 BenchmarksSystem Logs- --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- SELinux: Enabled.

tc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2scimark2: Compositescimark2: Monte Carloscimark2: Fast Fourier Transformscimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyscimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationscimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationtc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2555.93101.49277.13569.29739.721092.03OpenBenchmarking.org

SciMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Compositetc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2120240360480600SE +/- 0.68, N = 4555.931. (CC) gcc options: -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte Carlotc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark220406080100SE +/- 0.11, N = 4101.491. (CC) gcc options: -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transformtc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark260120180240300SE +/- 0.22, N = 4277.131. (CC) gcc options: -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiplytc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2120240360480600SE +/- 0.76, N = 4569.291. (CC) gcc options: -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationtc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark2160320480640800SE +/- 0.59, N = 4739.721. (CC) gcc options: -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationtc_2.2_run_1_cpu_performance_scimark22004006008001000SE +/- 1.86, N = 41092.031. (CC) gcc options: -lm