test1
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T testing with a ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX and AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB on Ubuntu 17.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


test2: 

	Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.30GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX, Chipset: AMD RD9x0/RX980, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 3 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1002FAEX-0 + 500GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: PB328, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411

	OS: Ubuntu 17.04, Kernel: 4.10.0-37-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.19.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.3, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 17.0.7 Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0), Compiler: GCC 6.3.0 20170406, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440

test3: 

	Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.30GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX, Chipset: AMD RD9x0/RX980, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 3 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1002FAEX-0 + 500GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: PB328, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411

	OS: Ubuntu 17.04, Kernel: 4.10.0-37-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.19.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.3, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 17.0.7 Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0), Compiler: GCC 6.3.0 20170406, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440

test4: 

	Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.30GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX, Chipset: AMD RD9x0/RX980, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 3 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1002FAEX-0 + 500GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 6970 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: PB328, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411

	OS: Ubuntu 17.04, Kernel: 4.10.0-37-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.19.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.3, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 17.0.7 Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0), Compiler: GCC 6.3.0 20170406, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440


asmFish 2017-09-19
1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
Nodes/second > Higher Is Better
test2 . 11675749 |=============================================================


Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test 2.0

test3 . FAIL


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test3 . 303.07 |===============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test3 . 97.37 |================================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test3 . 72.69 |================================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test3 . 248.23 |===============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test3 . 368.29 |===============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
test3 . 728.81 |===============================================================


Multichase Pointer Chaser
Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride
ns < Lower Is Better
test4 . 15.87 |================================================================


Multichase Pointer Chaser
Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride
ns < Lower Is Better
test4 . 51.06 |================================================================


Multichase Pointer Chaser
Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride
ns < Lower Is Better
test4 . 51.05 |================================================================


Multichase Pointer Chaser
Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads
ns < Lower Is Better
test4 . 54.32 |================================================================


Multichase Pointer Chaser
Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads
ns < Lower Is Better
test4 . 59.31 |================================================================