2017-10-05-0158
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 testing with a Dell 0CN7X8 and Matrox s G200eR2 on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 0CN7X8, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 1000GB Seagate ST1000NX0423, Graphics: Matrox s G200eR2, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit PCIe

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-96-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: nfs, Screen Resolution: 640x480


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1881.64 |==============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 906.38 |===============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1042.60 |==============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1650.47 |==============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 4499.70 |==============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 . 1309.05 |==============================================