cmov
Intel Core i7-5557U testing with a Intel NUC5i7RYB and Intel Iris 6100 on Clear Linux 12220 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


with-cmov: 

	Processor: Intel Core i7-5557U @ 3.40GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Intel NUC5i7RYB, Chipset: Intel Broadwell-U-OPI, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB INTEL SSDSC2BW12, Graphics: Intel Iris 6100 (1100MHz), Audio: Intel Broadwell-U Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel Connection + Intel Wireless 7265

	OS: Clear Linux 12220, Kernel: 4.12.0-366.native (x86_64), Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.3, Vulkan: 1.0.39, Compiler: GCC 7.1.1 20170630 + Clang 4.0.1 + LLVM 4.0.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 1721.03 |==========================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 1487.13 |==========================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 255.64 |===========================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 2162.45 |==========================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 3000.88 |==========================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 1699.04 |==========================================================


John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 3086 |=============================================================


John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: Traditional DES
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 4820000 |==========================================================


John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 40318 |============================================================


x264 2017-05-19
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
with-cmov . 86.32 |============================================================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
with-cmov . 58.13 |============================================================


Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
with-cmov . 46 |===============================================================


dcraw
RAW To PPM Image Conversion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
with-cmov . 17.02 |============================================================