Some fresh SSD Linux benchmarks on Linux 4.9 atop Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1706078-RI-1612151TA80
Samsung 960 EVO - SSD NVMe Disk Tests Linux 4.9
Some fresh SSD Linux benchmarks on Linux 4.9 atop Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article.
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
PNY CS1211 120GB:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: PNY CS1211 120GB + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850 + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Toshiba TR150 120GB:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB TOSHIBA-TR150 + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
VisionTek 240GB:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: VisionTek 240GB + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB:
Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 960 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
600P Test:
Processor: Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 07TYC2, Chipset: Intel Skylake, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: Intel HD 520 (1000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC3246, Network: Broadcom Limited BCM4350 802.11ac Wireless
OS: Arch rolling, Kernel: 4.11.3-1-ARCH (x86_64), Desktop: Openbox 3.6.1, Display Driver: intel 2.99.917, Compiler: GCC 7.1.1 20170528 + Clang 4.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 210.80 |========================================
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 93.50 |==================
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 101.28 |===================
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 58.90 |===========
VisionTek 240GB ........... 61.95 |============
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 120.63 |=======================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 173.63 |=================================
600P Test ................. 227.78 |===========================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 85.60 |============
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 193.97 |============================
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 111.07 |================
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 51.20 |=======
VisionTek 240GB ........... 50.53 |=======
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 302.37 |===========================================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 177.75 |=========================
600P Test ................. 97.07 |==============
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 79.58 |=============================
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 93.00 |=================================
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 63.77 |=======================
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 42.00 |===============
VisionTek 240GB ........... 42.00 |===============
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 120.03 |===========================================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 84.57 |==============================
600P Test ................. 85.62 |===============================
BlogBench 1.0
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 6861 |================
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 8612 |====================
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 6079 |==============
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 5719 |==============
VisionTek 240GB ........... 5135 |============
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 18489 |============================================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 11157 |===========================
600P Test ................. 5111 |============
Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s
MB/s > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 287.41 |================
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 271.02 |===============
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 392.14 |=====================
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 213.08 |============
VisionTek 240GB ........... 295.53 |================
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 788.37 |===========================================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 704.70 |======================================
600P Test ................. 256.26 |==============
Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s
MB/s > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 480.63 |===============
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 298.40 |==========
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 353.78 |===========
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 287.90 |=========
VisionTek 240GB ........... 338.53 |===========
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 322.91 |==========
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 1319.10 |==========================================
600P Test ................. 502.73 |================
Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s
MB/s > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 265.72 |==========
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 49.30 |==
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 457.30 |=================
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 187.94 |=======
VisionTek 240GB ........... 270.35 |==========
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 1115.40 |==========================================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 976.13 |=====================================
600P Test ................. 262.47 |==========
Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s
MB/s > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 485.99 |===============
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 117.71 |====
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 423.54 |=============
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 430.14 |=============
VisionTek 240GB ........... 406.43 |============
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 920.27 |============================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 1401.67 |==========================================
600P Test ................. 524.40 |================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 546.67 |==========================================
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 525.36 |========================================
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 494.32 |======================================
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 430.14 |=================================
VisionTek 240GB ........... 444.68 |==================================
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 516.96 |========================================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 558.75 |===========================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 2804.18 |==========================================
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 1256.41 |===================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 1933.19 |=============================
600P Test ................. 1694.04 |=========================
PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 251.36 |======================
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 261.43 |======================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 189.16 |================
600P Test ................. 502.13 |===========================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 5227.67 |==========================================
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 1212.92 |==========
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 3530.35 |============================
600P Test ................. 2023.89 |================
SQLite 3.8.10.2
Test Target: Default Test Directory
Seconds < Lower Is Better
INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 18.04 |============
PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 56.38 |======================================
Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 28.73 |===================
Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 36.88 |=========================
VisionTek 240GB ........... 31.05 |=====================
Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 65.36 |============================================
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB ..... 36.52 |=========================
600P Test ................. 23.60 |================