Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 16.10 vs. Clear Linux Intel Kabylake

Intel Core i5-7600K testing on Linux and Windows. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1701183-RI-1701175RI24
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 3 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Steam 2 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 10 Pro x64
January 16 2017
 
Ubuntu 16.10
January 16 2017
 
Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0
January 16 2017
 
Clear Linux 12760
January 17 2017
 
Antergos 17.1
January 17 2017
 
Fedora 25 Xfce
January 17 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 16.10 vs. Clear Linux Intel KabylakeProcessorDiskMotherboardChipsetMemoryGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionVulkanWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 XfceIntel Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 9 Intel (4 Cores)238GBWindows NT10.0 (x86_64)Intel Core i5-7600K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores)ASUS PRIME Z270-PIntel Device 591f16384MBSamsung SSD 950 PRO 256GBIntel Kabylake GT2 3072MB (1150MHz)Realtek ALC887-VDDELL P2415QRealtek RTL8111/8168/8411Ubuntu 16.104.8.0-34-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.5.0X Server 1.18.4modesetting 1.18.44.3 Mesa 12.0.3GCC 6.2.0 20161005ext41920x10804.10.0-999-generic (x86_64) 201701084.5 Mesa 17.0.0-devel- padoka PPA1.0.3Intel Core i5-7600K @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores)Clear Linux 127604.9.4-294.native (x86_64)Xfce 4.12X Server 1.19.1modesetting 1.19.14.5 Mesa 17.0.0-develGCC 6.3.0 + Clang 3.9.1 + LLVM 3.9.1Intel Core i5-7600K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores)(1150MHz)Antergos Linux 17.1-ISO-Rolling4.8.13-1-ARCH (x86_64)4.5 Mesa 13.0.3GCC 6.3.1 20170109Intel Kabylake GT2 3072MB (1150MHz)Fedora 254.9.3-200.fc25.x86_64 (x86_64)modesetting 1.19.11.0.30GCC 6.3.1 20161221OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Ubuntu 16.10: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Clear Linux 12760: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance- Antergos 17.1: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Fedora 25 Xfce: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveGraphics Details- Antergos 17.1: SNASystem Details- Fedora 25 Xfce: SELinux: Enabled.

Windows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 XfceResult OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%114%128%143%GpuTestXonoticUnigine ValleyXonoticGpuTestXonoticUnigine HeavenTriangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen1920 x 1080 - Low1280 x 1024 - Fullscreen1920 x 1080 - HighFurmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen1920 x 1080 - Ultra1280 x 1024 - Fullscreen

Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 16.10 vs. Clear Linux Intel Kabylakecsgo: 1920 x 1080tf2: 1920 x 1080unigine-heaven: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreenxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultragputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce40.973.0815.8917.97238.44131.18100.61132682929992698336.4762.9513.7712.57171.38107.3190.666643558335.9263.7614.3415.30161.77110.1193.506773708537.2767.0414.8916.41188.17123.47100.246653843414.1913.81155.64101.1885.666733868035.4159.7313.6712.70155.31100.0985.3866742283OpenBenchmarking.org

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Fedora 25 Xfce918273645SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 340.9036.4735.9237.2735.41
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Fedora 25 Xfce918273645Min: 35.95 / Avg: 36.47 / Max: 36.8Min: 35.9 / Avg: 35.92 / Max: 35.94Min: 37.15 / Avg: 37.27 / Max: 37.35Min: 35.3 / Avg: 35.41 / Max: 35.48

Team Fortress 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Fedora 25 Xfce1632486480SE +/- 0.92, N = 6SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 373.0862.9563.7667.0459.73
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Fedora 25 Xfce1428425670Min: 58.38 / Avg: 62.95 / Max: 64.1Min: 63.54 / Avg: 63.76 / Max: 63.89Min: 66.96 / Avg: 67.04 / Max: 67.1Min: 59.58 / Avg: 59.73 / Max: 59.81

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce48121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 315.8913.7714.3414.8914.1913.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce48121620Min: 15.87 / Avg: 15.89 / Max: 15.9Min: 13.73 / Avg: 13.77 / Max: 13.8Min: 14.3 / Avg: 14.34 / Max: 14.38Min: 14.86 / Avg: 14.89 / Max: 14.91Min: 14.1 / Avg: 14.19 / Max: 14.24Min: 13.67 / Avg: 13.67 / Max: 13.68

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 317.9712.5715.3016.4113.8112.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce510152025Min: 17.93 / Avg: 17.97 / Max: 18Min: 12.54 / Avg: 12.57 / Max: 12.59Min: 15.27 / Avg: 15.3 / Max: 15.32Min: 16.39 / Avg: 16.41 / Max: 16.42Min: 13.8 / Avg: 13.81 / Max: 13.82Min: 12.69 / Avg: 12.7 / Max: 12.71

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce50100150200250SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.79, N = 3SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.47, N = 3238.44171.38161.77188.17155.64155.31MIN: 169 / MAX: 324MIN: 120 / MAX: 269MIN: 106 / MAX: 259MIN: 133 / MAX: 288MIN: 109 / MAX: 246MIN: 111 / MAX: 242
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce4080120160200Min: 237.82 / Avg: 238.44 / Max: 239.19Min: 169.93 / Avg: 171.38 / Max: 172.64Min: 160.51 / Avg: 161.77 / Max: 162.63Min: 187.86 / Avg: 188.17 / Max: 188.78Min: 155.18 / Avg: 155.64 / Max: 156.24Min: 154.54 / Avg: 155.31 / Max: 156.17

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce306090120150SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.81, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3131.18107.31110.11123.47101.18100.09MIN: 79 / MAX: 163MIN: 78 / MAX: 143MIN: 80 / MAX: 154MIN: 81 / MAX: 154MIN: 74 / MAX: 137MIN: 73 / MAX: 137
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce20406080100Min: 130.95 / Avg: 131.18 / Max: 131.49Min: 105.73 / Avg: 107.31 / Max: 108.45Min: 110.07 / Avg: 110.11 / Max: 110.18Min: 123.32 / Avg: 123.47 / Max: 123.67Min: 101.02 / Avg: 101.18 / Max: 101.35Min: 100.01 / Avg: 100.09 / Max: 100.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce20406080100SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3100.6190.6693.50100.2485.6685.38MIN: 48 / MAX: 148MIN: 50 / MAX: 130MIN: 53 / MAX: 140MIN: 54 / MAX: 135MIN: 50 / MAX: 123MIN: 49 / MAX: 123
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce20406080100Min: 100.54 / Avg: 100.61 / Max: 100.66Min: 90.53 / Avg: 90.66 / Max: 90.83Min: 93.34 / Avg: 93.5 / Max: 93.63Min: 100.24 / Avg: 100.24 / Max: 100.25Min: 85.53 / Avg: 85.66 / Max: 85.88Min: 85.21 / Avg: 85.38 / Max: 85.5

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x6430060090012001500SE +/- 0.33, N = 31326

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce2004006008001000SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3829664677665673667
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce150300450600750Min: 828 / Avg: 829.33 / Max: 831Min: 664 / Avg: 664.33 / Max: 665Min: 675 / Avg: 676.67 / Max: 678Min: 664 / Avg: 665 / Max: 666Min: 673 / Avg: 673.33 / Max: 674Min: 666 / Avg: 666.67 / Max: 668

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x646001200180024003000SE +/- 0.00, N = 32999

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 94.48, N = 3SE +/- 29.61, N = 3SE +/- 21.62, N = 3SE +/- 72.19, N = 3SE +/- 113.29, N = 3269833558337085384343868042283
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.0Clear Linux 12760Antergos 17.1Fedora 25 Xfce7K14K21K28K35KMin: 26983 / Avg: 26983 / Max: 26983Min: 35394 / Avg: 35582.67 / Max: 35686Min: 37026 / Avg: 37084.67 / Max: 37121Min: 38400 / Avg: 38433.67 / Max: 38474Min: 38536 / Avg: 38680 / Max: 38761Min: 42120 / Avg: 42283.33 / Max: 42501