SSD NVMe Disk Tests Linux 4.9 Comparison

Samsung 850 EVO 6700K

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1701078-TA-1612143TA37

Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive ^{3 Tests}
Database Test Suite ^{2 Tests}
Disk Test Suite ^{4 Tests}
Server ^{3 Tests}

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Only show results where is faster than

Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

SSD NVMe Disk Tests Linux 4.9 Comparison Samsung 850 EVO 6700K INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 PNY CS1211 120GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: PNY CS1211 120GB + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Samsung 850 EVO 120GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850 + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Toshiba TR150 120GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB TOSHIBA-TR150 + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 VisionTek 240GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: VisionTek 240GB + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Samsung 950 PRO 256GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Samsung 850 EVO: Processor: Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS Z170-DELUXE, Chipset: Intel Skylake, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 500GB Samsung SSD 850 + 250GB Samsung SSD 840 + 512GB INTEL SSDPEKKW512G7 + Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB (135/324MHz), Audio: Intel Sunrise Point-H HD Audio, Network: Intel Connection OS: Fedora 25, Kernel: 4.8.15-300.fc25.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: MATE 1.16.1, Display Driver: NVIDIA 375.26, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.24, Compiler: GCC 6.3.1 20161221, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 5120x1440 FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 210.80 |=========================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 93.50 |=================== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 101.28 |===================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 58.90 |============ VisionTek 240GB ........... 61.95 |============= Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 120.63 |========================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 85.60 |============ PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 193.97 |============================ Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 111.07 |================ Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 51.20 |======= VisionTek 240GB ........... 50.53 |======= Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 302.37 |=========================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 79.58 |============================= PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 93.00 |================================= Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 63.77 |======================= Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 42.00 |=============== VisionTek 240GB ........... 42.00 |=============== Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 120.03 |=========================================== BlogBench 1.0 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 6861 |================ PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 8612 |==================== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 6079 |============== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 5719 |============== VisionTek 240GB ........... 5135 |============ Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 18489 |============================================ Samsung 850 EVO ........... 11367 |=========================== Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 287.41 |================ PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 271.02 |=============== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 392.14 |===================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 213.08 |============ VisionTek 240GB ........... 295.53 |================ Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 788.37 |=========================================== Samsung 850 EVO ........... 392.24 |===================== Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 480.63 |=========================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 298.40 |=========================== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 353.78 |================================ Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 287.90 |========================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 338.53 |============================== Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 322.91 |============================= Samsung 850 EVO ........... 354.91 |================================ Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 265.72 |========== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 49.30 |== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 457.30 |================= Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 187.94 |======= VisionTek 240GB ........... 270.35 |========== Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 1115.40 |========================================== Samsung 850 EVO ........... 458.33 |================= Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 485.99 |======================= PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 117.71 |====== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 423.54 |==================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 430.14 |==================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 406.43 |=================== Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 920.27 |=========================================== Samsung 850 EVO ........... 426.57 |==================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 546.67 |=========================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 525.36 |========================================= Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 494.32 |======================================= Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 430.14 |================================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 444.68 |=================================== Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 516.96 |========================================= Samsung 850 EVO ........... 398.38 |=============================== PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 2804.18 |========================================== INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 1256.41 |=================== Samsung 850 EVO ........... 1569.32 |======================== PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 251.36 |========================================= INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 261.43 |=========================================== Samsung 850 EVO ........... 167.95 |============================ PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 5227.67 |========================================== INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 1212.92 |========== Samsung 850 EVO ........... 3021.57 |======================== SQLite 3.8.10.2 Test Target: Default Test Directory Seconds < Lower Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 18.04 |============ PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 56.38 |====================================== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 28.73 |=================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 36.88 |========================= VisionTek 240GB ........... 31.05 |===================== Samsung 950 PRO 256GB ..... 65.36 |============================================ Samsung 850 EVO ........... 32.70 |======================