SSD Disk Tests Linux 4.9 Some fresh SSD Linux benchmarks on Linux 4.9 atop Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Tests by Michael Larabel. INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 13.1.0-devel (git-b27be18), Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 4.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 PNY CS1211 120GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: PNY CS1211 120GB + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 13.1.0-devel (git-b27be18), Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 4.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Samsung 850 EVO 120GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850 + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 13.1.0-devel (git-b27be18), Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 4.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Toshiba TR150 120GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB TOSHIBA-TR150 + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 13.1.0-devel (git-b27be18), Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 4.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 VisionTek 240GB: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: VisionTek 240GB + 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480 8192MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.9.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20161207, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 1.2.99, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 13.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 13.1.0-devel (git-b27be18), Vulkan: 1.0.3, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609 + LLVM 4.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 SQLite 3.8.10.2 Test Target: Default Test Directory Seconds < Lower Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 18.04 |============== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 56.38 |============================================ Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 28.73 |====================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 36.88 |============================= VisionTek 240GB ........... 31.05 |======================== Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 287.41 |================================ PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 271.02 |============================== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 392.14 |=========================================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 213.08 |======================= VisionTek 240GB ........... 295.53 |================================ Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 480.63 |=========================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 298.40 |=========================== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 353.78 |================================ Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 287.90 |========================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 338.53 |============================== Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 265.72 |========================= PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 49.30 |===== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 457.30 |=========================================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 187.94 |================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 270.35 |========================= Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Libaio - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 485.99 |=========================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 117.71 |========== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 423.54 |===================================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 430.14 |====================================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 406.43 |==================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 210.80 |=========================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 93.50 |=================== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 101.28 |===================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 58.90 |============ VisionTek 240GB ........... 61.95 |============= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 85.60 |=================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 193.97 |=========================================== Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 111.07 |========================= Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 51.20 |=========== VisionTek 240GB ........... 50.53 |=========== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 79.58 |====================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 93.00 |============================================ Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 63.77 |============================== Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 42.00 |==================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 42.00 |==================== BlogBench 1.0 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 6861 |==================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 8612 |============================================= Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 6079 |================================ Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 5719 |============================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 5135 |=========================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7 256GB . 546.67 |=========================================== PNY CS1211 120GB .......... 525.36 |========================================= Samsung 850 EVO 120GB ..... 494.32 |======================================= Toshiba TR150 120GB ....... 430.14 |================================== VisionTek 240GB ........... 444.68 |===================================