Ubuntu 16.10 with CFS.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1611164-LO-CFSVSMUQS05
CFS vs. MuQSS
Ubuntu 16.10 with CFS.
UbuntuCFS:
Processor: Intel Core i5-3230M @ 2.59GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Oracle VirtualBox v1.2, Chipset: Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 75GB VBOX HDD, Graphics: InnoTek VirtualBox, Audio: Intel 82801AA AC 97 Audio, Network: Intel 82540EM Gigabit
OS: Ubuntu 16.10, Kernel: 4.8.7-040807-generic (x86_64), Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.4, Compiler: GCC 6.2.0 20161005, File-System: ext4, System Layer: Oracle VirtualBox
ebizzy 0.3
Phoronix Test Suite v6.6.1
Records/s > Higher Is Better
UbuntuCFS . 37918 |============================================================
7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
UbuntuCFS . 4198 |=============================================================
John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
UbuntuCFS . 18932 |============================================================
John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: Traditional DES
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
UbuntuCFS . 2942667 |==========================================================
John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
UbuntuCFS . 1178 |=============================================================