Mini MX III Android TV Box benchmarks
GCC7 vs GCC5 testing


GCC7: 

	Processor: Unknown @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores), Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 16GB NCard + 32GB 00000

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 3.14.65-61 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 7.0.0 20160904 + LLVM 3.8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1440

GCC5: 

	Processor: Unknown @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores), Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 16GB NCard + 32GB 00000

	OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 3.14.65-61 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413 + LLVM 3.8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1440


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 4393.01 |=============================================================
GCC5 . 4530.97 |===============================================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 4460.41 |==============================================================
GCC5 . 4533.49 |===============================================================


Dolfyn 0.527
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
GCC7 . 267.76 |==================================================
GCC5 . 344.83 |================================================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 217.80 |================================================================
GCC5 . 217.82 |================================================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 113.59 |================================================================
GCC5 . 113.34 |================================================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 121.65 |================================================================
GCC5 . 121.98 |================================================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 146.07 |================================================================
GCC5 . 146.06 |================================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 137.15 |================================================================
GCC5 . 129.92 |=============================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 95.93 |=================================================================
GCC5 . 85.54 |==========================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 23.01 |==============================================================
GCC5 . 24.02 |=================================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 85.09 |=================================================================
GCC5 . 80.25 |=============================================================


ebizzy 0.3
Phoronix Test Suite v6.4.0
Records/s > Higher Is Better
GCC7 . 6890 |==================================================================
GCC5 . 5589 |======================================================


Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
GCC7 . 101.22 |================================================================
GCC5 . 100.89 |================================================================


FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.1
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
GCC7 . 153.32 |==============================================================
GCC5 . 157.33 |================================================================


Sudokut 0.4
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
GCC7 . 102.28 |================================================================
GCC5 . 102.64 |================================================================