Running pts/clomp-1.0.0, pts/fftw-1.1.0, pts/hmmer-1.1.1, pts/fhourstones-1.1.1, pts/botan-1.1.1, pts/ebizzy-1.0.3, pts/build-linux-kernel-1.6.0, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/smallpt-1.0.2, pts/crafty-1.3.1, pts/pgbench-1.5.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1608300-KH-1608277LO48
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 Linux Testing
Running pts/clomp-1.0.0, pts/fftw-1.1.0, pts/hmmer-1.1.1, pts/fhourstones-1.1.1, pts/botan-1.1.1, pts/ebizzy-1.0.3, pts/build-linux-kernel-1.6.0, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/smallpt-1.0.2, pts/crafty-1.3.1, pts/pgbench-1.5.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4:
Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI X99A WORKSTATION (MS-7A54) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 3 x 120GB TOSHIBA-TR150, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12288MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: ASUS PB278, Network: Intel Connection
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.8.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160823, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 11.2.0 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609:
Processor: Intel Core i7-6800K @ 4.10GHz (12 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte X99-Phoenix SLI-CF, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 240GB KINGSTON SH103S3 + 250GB Samsung SSD 840, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon HD 6450/7450/8450 / R5 230 OEM 1024MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: Intel Connection + Intel Wireless 8260
OS: Debian unstable, Kernel: 4.6.0-1-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.20.3, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 11.2.2 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 6.2.0 20160822, File-System: btrfs, Screen Resolution: 2560x1600
PostgreSQL pgbench 9.4.3
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 4291.83 |=====================================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 2248.19 |===================
Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 147.94 |======================================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 61.41 |================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 112 |=========================================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 48 |==================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 25.37 |=======================================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 13.91 |=====================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 125.48 |======================================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 75.70 |=======================
ebizzy 0.3
Phoronix Test Suite v6.6.0m2
Records/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 156073 |=============================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 206034 |======================================
Botan 1.11.6
Test: X9.19-MAC
Mbytes/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 38.60 |================================================
Botan 1.11.6
Test: CAST-256
Mbytes/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 50.22 |================================================
Botan 1.11.6
Test: Twofish
Mbytes/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 97.71 |================================================
Botan 1.11.6
Test: AES-256
Mbytes/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 2558.88 |==============================================
Botan 1.11.6
Test: KASUMI
Mbytes/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 37.48 |================================================
Botan 1.11.6
Test: Tiger
Mbytes/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 196.92 |===============================================
Fhourstones 3.1
Complex Connect-4 Solving
Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 6818.33 |=================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 14049.73 |====================================
Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2
Primate Phylogeny Analysis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 25.27 |================================================
Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 18.42 |=======================================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 12.47 |==========================
FFTW 3.3.4
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 7082.38 |=================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 14709.00 |====================================
CLOMP 3.3
Static OMP Speedup
Speedup > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 .......... 5.84 |========================================
Run against Intel Xeon E5-2609 . 5.71 |=======================================