ubuntu1604-R7790-vs-saphireRX480 AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core testing with a Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 and Gigabyte AMD Radeon HD 7790/8770 / R7 360 / R9 260/360 OEM 2048MB on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1608272-GNAR-UBUNTU191&gru .
ubuntu1604-R7790-vs-saphireRX480 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution ubuntu1604-R7790-vs-saphireRX480 AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores) Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 AMD RD890 bridge 16384MB 128GB PLEXTOR PX-128M5 + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKX-7 Gigabyte AMD Radeon HD 7790/8770 / R7 360 / R9 260/360 OEM 2048MB Realtek ALC889 A409U Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 Ubuntu 16.04 4.8.0-999-lowlatency (x86_64) Unity 7.4.0 X Server 1.18.3 modesetting 1.18.3 4.3 Mesa 12.1.0-devel- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4 GCC 5.4.0 20160609 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org - Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - GLAMOR
ubuntu1604-R7790-vs-saphireRX480 unigine-valley: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimate ubuntu1604-R7790-vs-saphireRX480 1.51 8.64 OpenBenchmarking.org
Unigine Valley Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen ubuntu1604-R7790-vs-saphireRX480 0.3398 0.6796 1.0194 1.3592 1.699 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 1.51
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate ubuntu1604-R7790-vs-saphireRX480 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.64 MIN: 6 / MAX: 12
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5