SciMark2_P9X79-E-WS
Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 testing with a ASUS P9X79-E WS and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 1024MB on openSUSE 20160422 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 0: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 @ 3.30GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS P9X79-E WS, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 8192 MB + 4096 MB + 2048 MB + 4096 MB + 4096 MB + 4096 MB + 4096 MB + 4096 MB DDR3-1333MHz, Disk: 1500GB SAMSUNG HD154UI + 1000GB Western Digital WD10EZRX-00A + 320GB Seagate ST9320325AS + 750GB Western Digital WD7500BPVT-2 + 2000GB MARVELL Raid VD, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 1024MB (901/900MHz), Audio: Intel C600/X79, Network: Intel I210 Gigabit Connection

	OS: openSUSE 20160422, Kernel: 4.6.2-3.g2a68ef0-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Frameworks 5, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 367.27, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.8, Compiler: ICC + CUDA 8.0, File-System: btrfs, Screen Resolution: 3840x1080


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1192.88 |===============================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 480.64 |================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 406.70 |================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1946.98 |===============================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2073.18 |===============================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1056.91 |===============================================