cfq

Intel Core i7-5557U testing with a Intel NUC5i7RYB and Intel Broadwell-U on Clear Linux 750 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1605033-GA-CFQ43750326
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 3 Tests
Bioinformatics 2 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 16 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 21 Tests
Creator Workloads 9 Tests
Cryptography 2 Tests
Database Test Suite 2 Tests
Disk Test Suite 5 Tests
Encoding 5 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 5 Tests
Imaging 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 3 Tests
Multi-Core 12 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 4 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 3 Tests
Server 5 Tests
Server CPU Tests 11 Tests
Single-Threaded 12 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
7880-cfq
May 03 2016
 
dummy
May 03 2016
 
newR
May 03 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

cfq, "AIO-Stress 0.21 - Test: Random Write", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2824.43,2843.92,2859.64 "SQLite 3.8.10.2 - Test Target: /", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",157.20356202126,156.77637290955,157.50278997421 "dummy",159.90552902222,159.552298069,159.43495798111 "SQLite 3.8.10.2 - Test Target: Default Test Directory", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",154.35784316063,154.16840100288,154.29034090042 "dummy",158.76619791985,155.12323403358,154.22739291191 "SQLite 3.12.0 - Timed SQLite Insertions", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",53.389614105225,53.346171140671,53.131084918976 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",81.7,78.5,83.1 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",184.8,190,182.4 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",82.4,81.7,82.5 "FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2705.7,2702.3,2706.4 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",8306.1240234375,8240.2919921875,8378.1279296875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",8516.0205078125,8399.1396484375,8519.453125 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",8682.7841796875,8527.0712890625,8503.9130859375 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",7509.53125,7676.9130859375,7614.14453125 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",7794.466796875,7579.5703125,7765.3232421875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",7689.6083984375,7835.76171875,7697.525390625 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",470.4296875,473.345703125,429.25,470.490234375,473.724609375,475.53125 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",489.3154296875,490.1484375,487.0712890625 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",498.943359375,498.1875,498.486328125 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",472.5634765625,472.341796875,469.51953125 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",488.7861328125,487.2080078125,489.12109375 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",498.9814453125,497.419921875,498.0810546875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",8947.412109375,8894.6767578125,8878.826171875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",9151.7421875,9140.8154296875,9077.568359375 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",9162.8505859375,9109.4169921875,9242.2529296875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",7245.34765625,7257.46875,6952.263671875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",6484.9697265625,6694.2802734375,6891.357421875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",475.330078125,473.080078125,469.9736328125 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",488.90625,489.646484375,487.4169921875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",498.2880859375,498.8408203125,498.732421875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",427.576171875,424.41796875,425.0185546875 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",425.2421875,423.1044921875,416.9697265625 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",8115.416015625,8113.484375,7774.0673828125 "IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",430.923828125,426.9580078125,426.3857421875 "Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Compile", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1824.99,1855.49,1824.81 "Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",474.57,436.13,464.61 "Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Read Compiled Tree", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1186.59,1186.77,1151.26 "Unpacking The Linux Kernel - linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",9.0666329860687,9.1895771026611,9.2685689926147,8.9981939792633 "PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",6756,6756,6756 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",20100.3,20067.8,20095.5,20090.1,20097.9,20080.5,20090.7,20082.9,20102.7,20097.9 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",13713.9,13724.5,13730.4,13730.4,13712.8,13725.7,13743.4,13741.1,13708,13726.8 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",15121,15070.5,15071.6,15107.8,15083.8,15117.1,15096.2,15074.3,15051.8,15092.4 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",15123,15085.8,15106.7,15124.8,15099.2,15128.5,15153.5,15091.5,15084.9,15101 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: BT.A", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2417.4,2432.67,2444.29 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: EP.C", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",85.47,86.68,86.66 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: FT.A", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",3303.55,3309.85,3299.41 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: LU.A", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",7527.82,7215.17,7211.16 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 - Test / Class: SP.A", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2090.96,2093.21,2080.95 "Dolfyn 0.527 - Computational Fluid Dynamics", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",22.562876939774,22.352579116821,22.705547809601 "Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 - Multiple Sequence Alignment", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",9.9271831512451,9.0840630531311,8.3340938091278,9.1337578296661,8.488107919693,9.0770571231842 "GMPbench 0.2 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq", "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1204.02,1268.25,1261.86,1141.36,1213.55,1268.43,1265.08,1267.62 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",605.8,605.92,605.76,605.91 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",300.38,300.39,300.73,300.1 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1790.81,2121.83,2067.01,1543.76 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2191.52,2175.92,2204.79,2119.9 "SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1131.57,1137.18,1131,1137.15 "John The Ripper 1.8.0 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",3233,3240,3235 "John The Ripper 1.8.0 - Test: Traditional DES", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",4793000,4787000,4797000 "John The Ripper 1.8.0 - Test: MD5", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",40550,40550,40592 "x264 2015-11-02 - H.264 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",97.7,97.92,98.44,97.45,97.85 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: Blur", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",122,122,122 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: Sharpen", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",80,80,80 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: Resizing", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",145,146,145 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: HWB Color Space", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",185,185,186 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 - Operation: Local Adaptive Thresholding", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",87,87,87 "Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - Poisson Pressure Solver", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2029.910153,2022.459363,2023.891479 "7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 - Compress Speed Test", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",10717,11067,10978 "ebizzy 0.3 - Phoronix Test Suite v6.2.2", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",65808,65903,65712 "Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",52.888156175613,53.14716219902,52.430509090424 "Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",162.32387304306,162.42995214462,161.34740996361 "Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",63.543646812439,63.241312980652,62.856029987335 "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",49.272,49.286,49.256 "Smallpt 1.0 - Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",46,47,47 "Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 - Test: 3000 Fall", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",5.44094,5.41978,5.420101 "Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 - Test: 1000 Stack", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",6.40894,6.759524,6.419997 "Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 - Test: 1000 Convex", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",5.5054,5.512639,5.526634 "Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 - Test: 136 Ragdolls", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",3.653169,3.656019,3.673904 "Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 - Test: Prim Trimesh", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1.149115,1.13912,1.137715 "Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 - Test: Convex Trimesh", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1.363875,1.367035,1.37152 "Gzip Compression - 2GB File Compression", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",3.2200729846954,3.037976026535,3.0589890480042 "LZMA Compression - 256MB File Compression", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",351.57305598259,330.66147589684,326.61635494232,327.43527793884,327.47385501862 "Crafty 23.4 - Elapsed Time", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",76.17,76.1,77.15 "dcraw - RAW To PPM Image Conversion", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",15.314468860626,15.331290960312,15.267112970352 "FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.1 - WAV To FLAC", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",6.4637598991394,6.4331700801849,6.4201900959015,6.4441330432892,6.4147789478302 "LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 - WAV To MP3", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",12.017377138138,12.004217863083,11.985453128815,11.972065925598,11.770092964172 "Ogg Encoding 1.3.0 - WAV To Ogg", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",6.8632619380951,6.8446960449219,6.8395180702209,7.5762591362,6.8539998531342,6.8389317989349,6.8455131053925,6.9968039989471,6.8320939540863 "FFmpeg 2.8.1 - H.264 HD To NTSC DV", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",12.732584953308,12.689211845398,12.833244085312 "Mencoder 1.1 - AVI To LAVC", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",22.102120876312,22.002407073975,21.958489894867 "R Benchmark - Phoronix Test Suite v6.2.2", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",0.27953156818338,0.26844328499121,0.27032876117021 "newR",0.27154025586417,0.2563998008196,0.25538922416476 "Sudokut 0.4 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",13.538466930389,13.509557008743,13.494942188263 "OpenSSL 1.0.1g - RSA 4096-bit Performance", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",310,309.7,309.7 "System Libxml2 Parsing - Filesize: 2 MB", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1403,1400 "System Libxml2 Parsing - Filesize: 3 MB", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2111,2105,2113 "System Libxml2 Parsing - Filesize: 112 MB", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",65662,65743,65645 "Redis 3.0.1 - Test: LPOP", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2070393.38,2061855.62,2024291.5 "Redis 3.0.1 - Test: SADD", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1834862.38,2087682.62,2061855.62,2118644,2053388.12,2083333.38 "Redis 3.0.1 - Test: LPUSH", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2012072.38,1972386.5,1893939.38 "Redis 3.0.1 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2531645.5,2551020.5,2341920.5,2457002.5,2518891.5 "Redis 3.0.1 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1964636.5,1897533.12,1876172.62 "Redis 3.0.7 - Test: LPOP", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2012072.38,1953124.88,1988071.5 "Redis 3.0.7 - Test: SADD", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2004008,2016129.12,1992032 "Redis 3.0.7 - Test: LPUSH", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1890359.25,1953124.88,1904762 "Redis 3.0.7 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",2403846,2475247.5,2415459 "Redis 3.0.7 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1751313.5,1845018.5,1709401.75,1712328.75,1766784.5 "PyBench 2008-08-14 - Total For Average Test Times", Lower Results Are Better "7880-cfq",1517,1512,1505 "Apache Benchmark 2.4.7 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "7880-cfq",30240.94,29886.73,29447.5