Running pts/scimark2-1.2.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1604268-KH-QU01TESTS35
qu01test-scimark2
Running pts/scimark2-1.2.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: AMD Opteron 63xx class @ 3.21GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996), Chipset: Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 21GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Red Hat QXL paravirtual graphic card, Audio: QEMU Generic, Network: Realtek RTL-8100/8101L/8139
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-21-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: qemu
2:
Processor: AMD Opteron 63xx class @ 3.21GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996), Chipset: Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 21GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Red Hat QXL paravirtual graphic card, Audio: QEMU Generic, Network: Realtek RTL-8100/8101L/8139
OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-21-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: qemu
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 711.72 |=================================================================
2 . 728.36 |===================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 1654.92 |=================================================================
2 . 1674.23 |==================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 990.80 |===================================================================
2 . 978.47 |==================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 52.23 |==================================================================
2 . 53.89 |====================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 396.82 |===================================================================
2 . 398.72 |===================================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
1 . 761.30 |===================================================================
2 . 766.73 |===================================================================