tornado03aacusroot
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2658 0 testing with a ADLINK Technolog aTCA-625 aTCA-6250 and Silicon Motion SM750 on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


011: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2658 0 @ 2.10GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: ADLINK Technolog aTCA-625 aTCA-6250, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 4 x 8192 MB DDR3-1600MHz Transcend TS1GKR72V6HL, Disk: 960GB SanDisk SDSSDXPS + 512GB M4-CT512M4SSD2 + 32GB SATADOM-MH 3ME, Graphics: LLVMpipe, Network: Intel 82599 10 Gigabit Dual Port Backplane Connection

	OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-76-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.2.6, Display Server: X Server 1.15.1, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.1, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 10.1.3 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.8.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

013: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2658 0 @ 2.10GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: ADLINK Technolog aTCA-625 aTCA-6250, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 4 x 8192 MB DDR3-1600MHz Transcend TS1GKR72V6HL, Disk: 960GB SanDisk SDSSDXPS + 512GB M4-CT512M4SSD2 + 32GB SATADOM-MH 3ME, Graphics: LLVMpipe, Network: Intel 82599 10 Gigabit Dual Port Backplane Connection

	OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-76-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.2.6, Display Server: X Server 1.15.1, Display Driver: modesetting 0.8.1, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 10.1.3 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.8.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


hdparm Timed Disk Reads
Disk To Read: /dev/sda
MB/s > Higher Is Better
011 . 265.37 |=================================================================


hdparm Timed Disk Reads
Disk To Read: /dev/sdb
MB/s > Higher Is Better
011 . 263.19 |=================================================================


hdparm Timed Disk Reads
Disk To Read: /dev/sdc
MB/s > Higher Is Better
011 . 295.82 |=================================================================


Cyclictest 0.84
Test Case: POSIX Timer, Interval 500 ms, 100000 Loops
ms Average < Lower Is Better
013 . 7 |======================================================================


Cyclictest 0.84
Test Case: POSIX Timer, Interval 10000 ms, 10000 Loops
ms Average < Lower Is Better
013 . 14 |=====================================================================


Cyclictest 0.84
Test Case: clock_nanosleep TIME_ABSTIME, Interval 500 ms, 100000 Loops
ms Average < Lower Is Better
013 . 5 |======================================================================


Cyclictest 0.84
Test Case: clock_nanosleep TIME_ABSTIME, Interval 10000 ms, 10000 Loops
ms Average < Lower Is Better
013 . 15 |=====================================================================