2016-03-19-1157
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 testing with a LENOVO 7732NEG and Intel Mobile GM965/GL960 IGP (primary) on LinuxMint 17.3 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection: 

	Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 @ 2.10GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO 7732NEG, Chipset: Intel Mobile PM965/GM965/GL960 + ICH8M-E, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 250GB Seagate ST9250827AS, Graphics: Intel Mobile GM965/GL960 IGP (primary), Audio: Intel 82801H, Network: Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection + Intel PRO/Wireless

	OS: LinuxMint 17.3, Kernel: 3.19.0-32-generic (i686), Desktop: Cinnamon 2.8.6, Display Server: X Server 1.15.1, Display Driver: intel 2.99.910, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 10.1.3, Compiler: GCC 4.8, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x800


N-Queens 1.0
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 227.47 |====================================


LZMA Compression
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 651.25 |====================================


Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 61.72 |=====================================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 145.85 |====================================


7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 3267 |======================================


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 702.34 |====================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 657.69 |====================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 534.87 |====================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 587.93 |====================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 48.88 |=====================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 196.82 |====================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 405.24 |====================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 904.46 |====================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 1073.69 |===================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 566.43 |====================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 454.23 |====================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 419.44 |====================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 683.65 |====================================


Loopback TCP Network Performance
Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 29.90 |=====================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 3501.42 |===================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 3482.18 |===================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 3021.73 |===================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 4214.72 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 2950.18 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 3123.39 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 2775.77 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 2774.79 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 3123.98 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 2900.46 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 3047.51 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 2678.12 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 2673.94 |===================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel 82566MM Gigabit Connection . 2999.81 |===================================