Ubuntu Skylake Linux 4.5 Mesa 11.0 vs. 11.2

Intel Core i5-6600K testing of different Skylake Mesa versions. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1602205-GA-UBUNTUSKY91
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Mesa 11.0.2
February 19 2016
 
Mesa 11.2-devel
February 19 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Minute
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Ubuntu Skylake Linux 4.5 Mesa 11.0 vs. 11.2OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores)MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) v1.0Intel Sky Lake15360MB256GB TS256GSSD370SIntel Sky Lake (1150MHz)Realtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 15.104.5.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160218UnityX Server 1.17.2intel 2.99.9173.3 Mesa 11.0.23.3 Mesa 11.2.0-devel (padoka PPA)GCC 5.2.1 20151010ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLsCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionUbuntu Skylake Linux 4.5 Mesa 11.0 Vs. 11.2 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- SNA

Mesa 11.0.2 vs. Mesa 11.2-devel ComparisonPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Baseline+1.8%+1.8%+3.6%+3.6%+5.4%+5.4%5%3.2%2.5%2.4%1920 x 10807%1920 x 10805.7%2560 x 14401920 x 1080 - Fullscreen3840 x 2160 - Low1920 x 10803840 x 21602.1%OpenArenaTeam Fortress 2TesseractUnigine ValleyXonoticTesseractTeam Fortress 2Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel

Ubuntu Skylake Linux 4.5 Mesa 11.0 vs. 11.2openarena: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 2560 x 1440tf2: 1920 x 1080tf2: 3840 x 2160unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Lowxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Highxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - UltimateMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel54.8042.5729.7445.8622.227.1957.4529.2324.1918.8051.2043.6031.2443.4021.777.4258.8729.6024.5319.16OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel1224364860SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 354.8051.20MIN: 12MIN: 12 / MAX: 68
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel1122334455Min: 54.6 / Avg: 54.8 / Max: 55.1Min: 49.9 / Avg: 51.2 / Max: 52.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel1224364860Min: 12 / Avg: 18.1 / Max: 32Min: 12 / Avg: 18.92 / Max: 61

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel1020304050SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 342.5743.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel918273645Min: 42.22 / Avg: 42.57 / Max: 42.96Min: 43.38 / Avg: 43.6 / Max: 43.79

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel714212835SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 329.7431.24
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel714212835Min: 29.46 / Avg: 29.74 / Max: 30.05Min: 30.83 / Avg: 31.24 / Max: 31.67

Team Fortress 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel1020304050SE +/- 0.80, N = 6SE +/- 0.48, N = 345.8643.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel918273645Min: 42.05 / Avg: 45.86 / Max: 47.25Min: 42.62 / Avg: 43.4 / Max: 44.29

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel510152025SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 322.2221.77
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160Mesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel510152025Min: 22.15 / Avg: 22.22 / Max: 22.28Min: 21.69 / Avg: 21.77 / Max: 21.84

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 37.197.42
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel3691215Min: 7.18 / Avg: 7.19 / Max: 7.2Min: 7.41 / Avg: 7.42 / Max: 7.43

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel1326395265SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 357.4558.87MIN: 37 / MAX: 75MIN: 37 / MAX: 79
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel1224364860Min: 57.35 / Avg: 57.45 / Max: 57.54Min: 58.58 / Avg: 58.87 / Max: 59.11

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel714212835SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 329.2329.60MIN: 17 / MAX: 37MIN: 17 / MAX: 38
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel714212835Min: 29.16 / Avg: 29.23 / Max: 29.32Min: 29.55 / Avg: 29.6 / Max: 29.63

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 324.1924.53MIN: 12 / MAX: 33MIN: 12 / MAX: 34
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel612182430Min: 24.14 / Avg: 24.19 / Max: 24.23Min: 24.49 / Avg: 24.53 / Max: 24.59

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel510152025SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 318.8019.16MIN: 9 / MAX: 28MIN: 9 / MAX: 29
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateMesa 11.0.2Mesa 11.2-devel510152025Min: 18.78 / Avg: 18.8 / Max: 18.83Min: 19.14 / Avg: 19.16 / Max: 19.17