Ubuntu 14.04 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Radeon Gallium3D Graphics AMD R600g Gallium3D driver tests of a Cayman AMD FirePro V7900 2048MB on Ubuntu 16.04 verus Ubuntu 14.04.0 using stock drivers. Tests by Michael Larabel.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1602126-GA-UBUEON46880&sro .
Ubuntu 14.04 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Radeon Gallium3D Graphics Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz (20 Cores) MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0 Intel Haswell-E DMI2 16384MB PNY CS1211 120GB + 80GB INTEL SSDSCKGW08 AMD FirePro V7900 2048MB Realtek ALC892 ASUS PB278 Intel Connection Ubuntu 14.04 3.13.0-32-generic (x86_64) Unity 7.2.2 X Server 1.15.1 radeon 7.3.0 3.3 Mesa 10.1.3 Gallium 0.4 GCC 4.8.4 ext4 2560x1440 Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.50GHz (20 Cores) Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon Ubuntu 16.04 4.4.0-4-generic (x86_64) Unity 7.4.0 X Server 1.17.3 radeon 7.6.1 3.3 Mesa 11.1.1 Gallium 0.4 GCC 5.3.1 20160205 4.4.0-5-generic (x86_64) 3.3 Mesa 11.1.2 Gallium 0.4 GCC 5.3.1 20160211 OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-libmudflap --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-tune=generic -v Processor Details - Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - Ubuntu 16.04 20160212: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance Graphics Details - EXA
Ubuntu 14.04 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Radeon Gallium3D Graphics openarena: 2560 x 1440 tesseract: 1920 x 1080 tesseract: 2560 x 1440 unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Low xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - High xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultra xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultimate gputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen specviewperf9: maya-02 specviewperf9: catia-02 specviewperf9: 3dsmax-04 Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 54.90 105.30 81.56 22.78 221.36 113.43 95.73 71.57 20106 774 47702 58504 58372 44.97 3.59 12.84 64.00 111.35 83.20 21.82 273.14 123.62 100.30 75.92 24235 730 81569 70602 83147 64.47 110.79 82.99 21.82 274.63 123.99 100.22 76.02 24246 732 81532 71583 82964 OpenBenchmarking.org
OpenArena Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 54.90 64.47 64.00 MIN: 7 MIN: 4 / MAX: 276 MIN: 10 / MAX: 285
OpenArena Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 7 / Avg: 18.18 / Max: 37 Min: 10 / Avg: 15.51 / Max: 22 Min: 10 / Avg: 15.5 / Max: 22
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.83, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 105.30 110.79 111.35
Tesseract Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 81.56 82.99 83.20
Unigine Valley Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 22.78 21.82 21.82
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Low Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.19, N = 3 SE +/- 1.92, N = 3 SE +/- 5.24, N = 6 221.36 274.63 273.14 MIN: 118 / MAX: 351 MIN: 124 / MAX: 475 MIN: 125 / MAX: 516
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 113.43 123.99 123.62 MIN: 49 / MAX: 191 MIN: 57 / MAX: 228 MIN: 56 / MAX: 227
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 95.73 100.22 100.30 MIN: 40 / MAX: 166 MIN: 42 / MAX: 188 MIN: 44 / MAX: 181
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 71.57 76.02 75.92 MIN: 29 / MAX: 139 MIN: 31 / MAX: 144 MIN: 30 / MAX: 144
GpuTest Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 20106 24246 24235
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 170 340 510 680 850 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 2.96, N = 3 774 732 730
GpuTest Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 SE +/- 3.53, N = 3 47702 81532 81569
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 79.44, N = 3 SE +/- 348.45, N = 3 SE +/- 494.78, N = 3 58504 71583 70602
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8 Ubuntu 16.04 20160212 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 38.18, N = 3 SE +/- 393.42, N = 3 SE +/- 329.74, N = 3 58372 82964 83147
SPECViewPerf 9 SPECViewPerf Test: maya-02 OpenBenchmarking.org Weighted Geometric Mean, More Is Better SPECViewPerf 9 SPECViewPerf Test: maya-02 Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 44.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
SPECViewPerf 9 SPECViewPerf Test: catia-02 OpenBenchmarking.org Weighted Geometric Mean, More Is Better SPECViewPerf 9 SPECViewPerf Test: catia-02 Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS 0.8078 1.6156 2.4234 3.2312 4.039 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 3.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
SPECViewPerf 9 SPECViewPerf Test: 3dsmax-04 OpenBenchmarking.org Weighted Geometric Mean, More Is Better SPECViewPerf 9 SPECViewPerf Test: 3dsmax-04 Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 12.84 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5