Ubuntu 14.04 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Radeon Gallium3D Graphics

AMD R600g Gallium3D driver tests of a Cayman AMD FirePro V7900 2048MB on Ubuntu 16.04 verus Ubuntu 14.04.0 using stock drivers. Tests by Michael Larabel.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1602126-GA-UBUEON46880
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Triggered
  Test
  Duration
Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS
February 11 2016
 
Ubuntu 16.04 20160212
February 12 2016
 
Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8
February 12 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Minute

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Ubuntu 14.04 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Radeon Gallium3D GraphicsProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz (20 Cores)MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0Intel Haswell-E DMI216384MBPNY CS1211 120GB + 80GB INTEL SSDSCKGW08AMD FirePro V7900 2048MBRealtek ALC892ASUS PB278Intel ConnectionUbuntu 14.043.13.0-32-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.2.2X Server 1.15.1radeon 7.3.03.3 Mesa 10.1.3 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.8.4ext42560x1440Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.50GHz (20 Cores)Intel Xeon E7 v3/XeonUbuntu 16.044.4.0-4-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.17.3radeon 7.6.13.3 Mesa 11.1.1 Gallium 0.4GCC 5.3.1 201602054.4.0-5-generic (x86_64)3.3 Mesa 11.1.2 Gallium 0.4GCC 5.3.1 20160211OpenBenchmarking.orgCompiler Details- Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-libmudflap --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-tune=generic -v Processor Details- Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ubuntu 16.04 20160212: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performanceGraphics Details- EXA

Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite 10.4.0m1100%107%114%121%GpuTestOpenArenaXonoticUnigine ValleyTesseract

Ubuntu 14.04 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Radeon Gallium3D Graphicsopenarena: 2560 x 1440tesseract: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 2560 x 1440unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Lowxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Highxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultraxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultimategputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenspecviewperf9: maya-02specviewperf9: catia-02specviewperf9: 3dsmax-04Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.854.90105.3081.5622.78221.36113.4395.7371.572010677447702585045837244.973.5912.8464.00111.3583.2021.82273.14123.62100.3075.922423573081569706028314764.47110.7982.9921.82274.63123.99100.2276.0224246732815327158382964OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.81428425670SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 354.9064.0064.47MIN: 7MIN: 10 / MAX: 285MIN: 4 / MAX: 276
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.81326395265Min: 54.9 / Avg: 54.9 / Max: 54.9Min: 63 / Avg: 64 / Max: 64.6Min: 64.4 / Avg: 64.47 / Max: 64.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame TimeUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8816243240Min: 7 / Avg: 18.18 / Max: 37Min: 10 / Avg: 15.5 / Max: 22Min: 10 / Avg: 15.51 / Max: 22

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820406080100SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3105.30111.35110.79
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820406080100Min: 104.96 / Avg: 105.3 / Max: 105.77Min: 110.66 / Avg: 111.35 / Max: 111.8Min: 109.18 / Avg: 110.79 / Max: 111.96

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820406080100SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 381.5683.2082.99
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.81632486480Min: 81.26 / Avg: 81.56 / Max: 81.87Min: 82.78 / Avg: 83.2 / Max: 83.7Min: 82.63 / Avg: 82.99 / Max: 83.21

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 322.7821.8221.82
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8510152025Min: 22.73 / Avg: 22.78 / Max: 22.82Min: 21.78 / Avg: 21.82 / Max: 21.85Min: 21.77 / Avg: 21.82 / Max: 21.86

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: LowUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.860120180240300SE +/- 1.19, N = 3SE +/- 5.24, N = 6SE +/- 1.92, N = 3221.36273.14274.63MIN: 118 / MAX: 351MIN: 125 / MAX: 516MIN: 124 / MAX: 475
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: LowUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.850100150200250Min: 219.67 / Avg: 221.36 / Max: 223.65Min: 256.64 / Avg: 273.14 / Max: 283.86Min: 271.89 / Avg: 274.63 / Max: 278.34

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8306090120150SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 3113.43123.62123.99MIN: 49 / MAX: 191MIN: 56 / MAX: 227MIN: 57 / MAX: 228
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820406080100Min: 113.39 / Avg: 113.43 / Max: 113.48Min: 122.68 / Avg: 123.62 / Max: 124.76Min: 123 / Avg: 123.99 / Max: 124.58

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820406080100SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 395.73100.30100.22MIN: 40 / MAX: 166MIN: 44 / MAX: 181MIN: 42 / MAX: 188
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820406080100Min: 95.65 / Avg: 95.73 / Max: 95.82Min: 100.07 / Avg: 100.3 / Max: 100.69Min: 100.09 / Avg: 100.22 / Max: 100.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltimateUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820406080100SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 371.5775.9276.02MIN: 29 / MAX: 139MIN: 30 / MAX: 144MIN: 31 / MAX: 144
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltimateUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.81530456075Min: 71.41 / Avg: 71.57 / Max: 71.66Min: 75.45 / Avg: 75.92 / Max: 76.46Min: 75.68 / Avg: 76.02 / Max: 76.21

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.85K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3201062423524246
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.84K8K12K16K20KMin: 20105 / Avg: 20106.33 / Max: 20107Min: 24234 / Avg: 24234.67 / Max: 24235Min: 24245 / Avg: 24245.67 / Max: 24246

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8170340510680850SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 2.96, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3774730732
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.8140280420560700Min: 773 / Avg: 773.67 / Max: 774Min: 726 / Avg: 730.33 / Max: 736Min: 731 / Avg: 732 / Max: 733

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 3.53, N = 3SE +/- 1.67, N = 3477028156981532
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.814K28K42K56K70KMin: 47701 / Avg: 47702.33 / Max: 47704Min: 81564 / Avg: 81569.33 / Max: 81576Min: 81529 / Avg: 81532.33 / Max: 81534

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.815K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 79.44, N = 3SE +/- 494.78, N = 3SE +/- 348.45, N = 3585047060271583
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.812K24K36K48K60KMin: 58418 / Avg: 58504.33 / Max: 58663Min: 69830 / Avg: 70601.67 / Max: 71524Min: 71175 / Avg: 71582.67 / Max: 72276

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.820K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 38.18, N = 3SE +/- 329.74, N = 3SE +/- 393.42, N = 3583728314782964
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.04.0 LTSUbuntu 16.04 20160212Ubuntu 16.04 + Mesa 11.1.2 + LLVM 3.814K28K42K56K70KMin: 58308 / Avg: 58371.67 / Max: 58440Min: 82490 / Avg: 83147.33 / Max: 83522Min: 82416 / Avg: 82964 / Max: 83727

SPECViewPerf 9

OpenBenchmarking.orgWeighted Geometric Mean, More Is BetterSPECViewPerf 9SPECViewPerf Test: maya-02Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS1020304050SE +/- 0.09, N = 344.971. (CC) gcc options: -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgWeighted Geometric Mean, More Is BetterSPECViewPerf 9SPECViewPerf Test: catia-02Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS0.80781.61562.42343.23124.039SE +/- 0.04, N = 33.591. (CC) gcc options: -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgWeighted Geometric Mean, More Is BetterSPECViewPerf 9SPECViewPerf Test: 3dsmax-04Ubuntu 14.04.0 LTS3691215SE +/- 0.06, N = 312.841. (CC) gcc options: -lm