Linux 4.5 AMDGPU + Mesa 11.2-dev vs. Catalyst Linux 4.5 AMDGPU and Radeon DRM benchmarks with Mesa 11.2-dev Git and LLVM SVN back-end via Padoka PPA. DRI3 enabled and swapbufferswait disabled. Tests added in now from latest Linux 4.5-rc2...
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1602018-GA-AMDGPU87225&grs&sor .
Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev R9 285 R9 Fury R9 285 R9 Fury R9 285 R9 Fury Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores) Gigabyte X99-UD4-CF Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon 16384MB 120GB Samsung SSD 850 Supported device 6939 2048MB Realtek ALC1150 DELL P2415Q Intel Connection Ubuntu 15.10 4.2.0-25-generic (x86_64) Unity X Server 1.17.2 fglrx 15.20.3 4.4.13399 GCC 5.2.1 20151010 ext4 3840x2160 Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 Fury 4096MB XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MB 4.5.0-rc1amdgpu-pp+ (x86_64) 20160125 radeon 7.6.99 4.1 Mesa 11.2.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4 Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4096MB XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MB 4.5.0-rc2amdgpu-pp+ (x86_64) 20160201 amdgpu 1.0.99 Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4096MB OpenBenchmarking.org Environment Details - Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10: R9 285, Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10: R9 Fury: LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=/usr/lib/fglrx/dri:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri:/usr/lib/dri:/usr/lib32/fglrx/dri:/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance Kernel Details - Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev: R9 285, Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev: R9 Fury, Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev: R9 285, Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev: R9 Fury: amdgpu.powerplay=1 Graphics Details - Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev: R9 285, Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev: R9 Fury, Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev: R9 285, Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev: R9 Fury: GLAMOR
openarena: 2560 x 1440 bioshock-infinite: 2560 x 1440 - Very High csgo: 3840 x 2160 dirt-showdown: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra - 8x MSAA metroll-redux: Phoronix Test Suite v6.2.0m3 tf2: 3840 x 2160 unigine-valley: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimate xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Low Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev R9 285 R9 Fury R9 285 R9 Fury R9 285 R9 Fury 205.97 27.03 68.46 64.44 32.50 103.04 31.89 173.67 126.88 282.81 283.80 40.27 106.16 64.87 60.63 114.21 62.05 199.06 164.86 287.12 179.10 30.32 66.36 46.95 21.22 70.46 28.51 117.31 91.90 279.57 51.27 8.51 30.29 22.18 20.41 42.88 93.27 225.56 182.43 29.89 47.31 21.32 65.52 28.67 115.92 88.01 283.83 51.63 8.45 29.59 21.28 20.23 43.05 92.08 222.26 OpenBenchmarking.org
OpenArena Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time R9 Fury R9 285 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.49 / Max: 36 Min: 1 / Avg: 4.81 / Max: 41 Min: 2 / Avg: 5.44 / Max: 36 Min: 3 / Avg: 19.21 / Max: 54 Min: 2 / Avg: 5.49 / Max: 37 Min: 3 / Avg: 19.52 / Max: 44
OpenArena Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 R9 Fury R9 285 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.90, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 283.80 205.97 182.43 51.63 179.10 51.27
BioShock Infinite Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Very High Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better BioShock Infinite Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Very High R9 Fury R9 285 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 40.27 27.03 30.32 8.51 29.89 8.45
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Resolution: 3840 x 2160 R9 Fury R9 285 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 106.16 68.46 66.36 30.29 29.59
DiRT Showdown Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 8x MSAA Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better DiRT Showdown Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 8x MSAA R9 Fury R9 285 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 64.87 64.44 47.31 21.28 46.95 22.18
Metro: Last Light Redux Phoronix Test Suite v6.2.0m3 Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Metro: Last Light Redux Phoronix Test Suite v6.2.0m3 R9 Fury R9 285 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 60.63 32.50 21.32 20.23 21.22 20.41
Team Fortress 2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Team Fortress 2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 R9 Fury R9 285 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.65, N = 5 SE +/- 1.67, N = 4 SE +/- 2.35, N = 6 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 114.21 103.04 70.46 42.88 65.52 43.05
Unigine Valley Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen R9 Fury R9 285 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 62.05 31.89 28.67 28.51
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra R9 Fury R9 285 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 SE +/- 1.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 199.06 173.67 117.31 93.27 115.92 92.08
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate R9 Fury R9 285 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.57, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 164.86 126.88 91.90 88.01
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low Catalyst Ubuntu 15.10 Linux 4.5-rc2 + Mesa 10.2-dev Linux 4.5-rc1 + Mesa 10.2-dev OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low R9 Fury R9 285 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.43, N = 3 SE +/- 2.54, N = 3 SE +/- 1.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 2.55, N = 3 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 287.12 282.81 283.83 222.26 279.57 225.56
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4