Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.1, pts/sqlite-1.9.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.1, pts/dbench-1.0.0, pts/iozone-1.8.0, pts/tiobench-1.2.0, pts/unpack-linux-1.0.0, pts/postmark-1.1.0, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0, pts/apache-1.6.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1512031-JMAR-151203438
Comparativa RAID 1 vs 10
Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.1, pts/sqlite-1.9.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.1, pts/dbench-1.0.0, pts/iozone-1.8.0, pts/tiobench-1.2.0, pts/unpack-linux-1.0.0, pts/postmark-1.1.0, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0, pts/apache-1.6.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
RAID 1:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X10DRU-i+, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5 v3/Core, Memory: 8 x 8192 MB 2133MHz Samsung, Disk: 998GB SMC2108, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.3 20140911, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
RAID 10:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X10DRU-i+, Memory: 8 x 8192 MB 2133MHz Samsung, Disk: 998GB SMC2108
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.3 20140911, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
RAID 1 2 best disks:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X10DRU-i+, Memory: 8 x 8192 MB 2133MHz Samsung, Disk: 499GB SMC2108
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.3 20140911, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
RAID 1 2 worst disks:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X10DRU-i+, Memory: 8 x 8192 MB 2133MHz Samsung, Disk: 499GB SMC2108
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.3 20140911, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
RAID 1 alternative order:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X10DRU-i+, Memory: 8 x 8192 MB 2133MHz Samsung, Disk: 998GB SMC2108
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.3 20140911, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
FS-Mark 3.3
1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 85.60 |=============================================
RAID 10 .................. 64.93 |==================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 60.67 |================================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 56.37 |==============================
RAID 1 alternative order . 66.13 |===================================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 1866.36 |======================================
RAID 10 .................. 1901.73 |=======================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 1934.67 |========================================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 2106.00 |===========================================
RAID 1 alternative order . 1932.17 |=======================================
Dbench 4.0
12 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 6706.05 |===========================================
RAID 10 .................. 694.51 |====
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 1350.60 |=========
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 438.03 |===
RAID 1 alternative order . 669.61 |====
Dbench 4.0
48 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 5732.28 |===========================================
RAID 10 .................. 390.54 |===
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 333.56 |===
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 204.26 |==
RAID 1 alternative order . 331.17 |==
Dbench 4.0
128 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 2334.20 |===========================================
RAID 10 .................. 88.48 |==
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 61.65 |=
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 29.96 |=
RAID 1 alternative order . 81.86 |==
Dbench 4.0
1 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 655.71 |============================================
RAID 10 .................. 221.23 |===============
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 247.20 |=================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 191.73 |=============
RAID 1 alternative order . 218.74 |===============
IOzone 3.405
8GB Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 4096.36 |==========================================
RAID 10 .................. 4193.05 |===========================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 4158.94 |===========================================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 4180.81 |===========================================
RAID 1 alternative order . 4151.87 |===========================================
IOzone 3.405
8GB Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 121.26 |============================================
RAID 10 .................. 114.13 |=========================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 74.83 |===========================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 70.75 |==========================
RAID 1 alternative order . 115.51 |==========================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Read - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 9855.92 |========================================
RAID 10 .................. 9485.61 |======================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 10367.64 |==========================================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 9824.05 |========================================
RAID 1 alternative order . 10240.79 |=========================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Write - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 3.29 |==============================================
RAID 10 .................. 1.79 |=========================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 1.14 |================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 0.87 |============
RAID 1 alternative order . 1.91 |===========================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 29139.93 |==========================================
RAID 10 .................. 16703.59 |========================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 17045.46 |=========================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 16212.87 |=======================
RAID 1 alternative order . 16510.09 |========================
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 4191 |==============================================
RAID 10 .................. 3750 |=========================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 3865 |==========================================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 3802 |==========================================
RAID 1 alternative order . 3768 |=========================================
SQLite 3.8.10.2
Timed SQLite Insertions
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 4.66 |==========
RAID 10 .................. 16.45 |===================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 9.90 |=====================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 20.94 |=============================================
RAID 1 alternative order . 16.87 |====================================
Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 9.04 |=============================================
RAID 10 .................. 8.99 |=============================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 9.05 |=============================================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 9.05 |=============================================
RAID 1 alternative order . 9.22 |==============================================
Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RAID 1 ................... 12.38 |=============================================
RAID 10 .................. 12.29 |=============================================
RAID 1 2 best disks ...... 12.18 |============================================
RAID 1 2 worst disks ..... 12.06 |============================================
RAID 1 alternative order . 12.14 |============================================