Running pts/cachebench-1.0.0, pts/scimark2-1.2.0, pts/x264-1.9.0, pts/compress-7zip-1.6.1, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/compress-pbzip2-1.4.1, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1510298-PAUL-151029295
Processor Tests
Running pts/cachebench-1.0.0, pts/scimark2-1.2.0, pts/x264-1.9.0, pts/compress-7zip-1.6.1, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/compress-pbzip2-1.4.1, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
FX8320:
Processor: AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core @ 3.50GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BP24 + 3000GB VD10-0, Graphics: Gallium 0.4 on AMD BARTS (DRM 2.41.0 LLVM 3.5.0) 1024MB, Monitor: BenQ BL2201
OS: Gentoo/Linux, Kernel: 4.0.9-gentoo-test-release (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Frameworks 5, Display Server: X Server 1.16.4, Display Driver: radeon 7.5.0, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 11.0.3 Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 4.9.3 + LLVM 3.5.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 5040x1050
A10-7800:
Processor: AMD A10-7800 Radeon R7 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G @ 3.50GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte F2A88XN-WIFI, Memory: 7168MB, Disk: 60GB KINGSTON SV300S3, Graphics: 1024MB, Monitor: SONY TV
OS: Gentoo/Linux, Kernel: 4.1.12-gentoo-test (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.9.3 + LLVM 3.5.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x720
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance:
Processor: AMD A10-7800 Radeon R7 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G @ 3.50GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte F2A88XN-WIFI, Memory: 7168MB, Disk: 60GB KINGSTON SV300S3, Graphics: 1024MB, Monitor: SONY TV
OS: Gentoo/Linux, Kernel: 4.1.12-gentoo-test (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.9.3 + LLVM 3.5.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x720
Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 14.59 |======================================
A10-7800 ..................... 15.54 |=========================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 15.27 |========================================
Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 7.50 |=================
A10-7800 ..................... 18.27 |=========================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 17.48 |=======================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 28.43 |=====================
A10-7800 ..................... 56.00 |=========================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 56.11 |=========================================
7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 18500 |=========================================
A10-7800 ..................... 9331 |=====================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 9376 |=====================
x264 2014-08-30
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 139.69 |========================================
A10-7800 ..................... 84.61 |========================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 84.82 |========================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 745.96 |========================================
A10-7800 ..................... 651.07 |===================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 651.10 |===================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 1684.62 |=======================================
A10-7800 ..................... 959.32 |======================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 952.76 |======================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 982.14 |========================================
A10-7800 ..................... 771.47 |===============================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 771.10 |===============================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 65.56 |==============================
A10-7800 ..................... 89.89 |=========================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 89.03 |=========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 419.23 |========================================
A10-7800 ..................... 354.04 |==================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 353.63 |==================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 779.54 |========================================
A10-7800 ..................... 565.16 |=============================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 563.47 |=============================
CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 15040.47 |=========================
A10-7800 ..................... 22594.46 |======================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 22635.04 |======================================
CacheBench
Test: Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 7991.08 |===========================
A10-7800 ..................... 11190.40 |======================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 11208.41 |======================================
CacheBench
Test: Read
MB/s > Higher Is Better
FX8320 ....................... 1733.49 |=======================================
A10-7800 ..................... 1553.19 |===================================
A10-7800-cpufreq-performance . 1553.76 |===================================