Benchmarks by Michael Larabel.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1508224-HA-BCACHEFSL02
BcacheFS Linux FS Testing,
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"BcacheFS",24,24.3,24.4
"EXT4",
"Btrfs",
"XFS",
"F2FS",
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads",
Higher Results Are Better
"BcacheFS",29.7,29,29
"EXT4",
"Btrfs",
"XFS",
"F2FS",
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"BcacheFS",23.2,23.2,23.8
"EXT4",
"Btrfs",
"XFS",
"F2FS",
"Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s",
Higher Results Are Better
"BcacheFS",10.404,10.463,10.475
"EXT4",22.708
"Btrfs",19.234
"XFS",22.221
"F2FS",22.517
"Flexible IO Tester 2.1.13 - Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory - Result: MB/s",
Higher Results Are Better
"BcacheFS",16.093,16.185,16.18
"EXT4",62.389
"Btrfs",46.646
"XFS",61.017
"F2FS",61.698
"Dbench 4.0 - Client Count: 1",
Higher Results Are Better
"BcacheFS",16.3026,16.2621,16.3609
"EXT4",17.3606
"Btrfs",17.0803
"XFS",17.359
"F2FS",34.2971
"Dbench 4.0 - Client Count: 6",
Higher Results Are Better
"BcacheFS",58.6994
"EXT4",64.677
"Btrfs",53.3449
"XFS",59.6365
"F2FS",55.0048
"Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create",
Higher Results Are Better
"BcacheFS",131.16,148.18,142.58
"EXT4",
"Btrfs",
"XFS",
"F2FS",