under_load_2° 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 testing with a Intel S2600CW and Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1) on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Under applicative load 20: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (48 Cores), Motherboard: Intel S2600CW, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 258048MB, Disk: 2 x 300GB INTEL SSDSC2BB30, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200e [Pilot] (SEP1), Network: Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2 OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-61-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480 AIO-Stress 0.21 Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1496.40 |========================================== SQLite 3.8.10.2 Timed SQLite Insertions Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 27.11 |============================================ FS-Mark 3.3 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 217.33 |=========================================== Dbench 4.0 12 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 614.61 |=========================================== Dbench 4.0 48 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 587.70 |=========================================== Dbench 4.0 128 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 527.14 |=========================================== Dbench 4.0 1 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 210.10 |=========================================== IOzone 3.405 8GB Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 5783.54 |========================================== IOzone 3.405 8GB Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 238.99 |=========================================== IOzone 3.405 Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 5204.27 |========================================== IOzone 3.405 Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 230.85 |=========================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 19170.38 |========================================= Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 60.23 |============================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 10899.39 |========================================= Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 113.90 |=========================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1185.17 |========================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 248.47 |=========================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1772.37 |========================================== Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 12.68 |============================================ PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 3884 |============================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 21847.92 |========================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 21263.78 |========================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Integer Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 21297.40 |========================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Floating-Point Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 18967.36 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 26568.91 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 27233.49 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 33419.40 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 33165.42 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 27607.04 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 27233.49 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 33165.42 |========================================= Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 3.01 |============================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 18103.08 |========================================= Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 12.24 |============================================ Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 6.14 |============================================= GMPbench 0.2 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 3101.90 |========================================== CacheBench Read Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 2391.72 |========================================== CacheBench Write Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 12580.79 |========================================= Gcrypt Library 1.4.4 CAMELLIA256-ECB Cipher Microseconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 2770 |============================================= John The Ripper 1.8.0 Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 12831667 |========================================= John The Ripper 1.8.0 Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 10704 |============================================ TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.2z Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 131.61 |=========================================== x264 2014-08-30 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 283.72 |=========================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 167 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 164 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Local Adaptive Thresholding Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 73 |=============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 126 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.19 Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 133 |============================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1438.04 |========================================== 7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 64635 |============================================ C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 5.45 |============================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 19 |=============================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 7.29 |============================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1.81 |============================================= Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 13.62 |============================================ LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 181.86 |=========================================== dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 61.73 |============================================ FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.1 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 10.87 |============================================ LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 16.55 |============================================ Ogg Encoding 1.3.0 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 9.95 |============================================= FFmpeg 2.6.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 22.11 |============================================ GnuPG 1.4.10 1GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 10.07 |============================================ Minion 0.15 Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 106.74 |=========================================== Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 631.13 |=========================================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 20.51 |============================================ Tachyon 0.98.9 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 3.30 |============================================= OpenSSL 1.0.1g RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 2702.13 |========================================== PyBench 2008-08-14 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1743 |============================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.0.11 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 25898.38 |========================================= Apache Benchmark 2.4.7 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 24287.84 |========================================= PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 116558 |=========================================== Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Under applicative load 20 . 1.36 |=============================================