Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.1, pts/sqlite-1.9.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.0, pts/tiobench-1.2.0, pts/compilebench-1.0.1, pts/postmark-1.1.0, pts/stream-1.2.0, pts/network-loopback-1.0.1, pts/npb-1.2.1, pts/cachebench-1.0.0, pts/john-the-ripper-1.5.1, pts/compress-7zip-1.6.0, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/openssl-1.9.0, pts/apache-1.6.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1507244-BE-REDHATSTA45
redhat_standard
Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.1, pts/sqlite-1.9.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.0, pts/tiobench-1.2.0, pts/compilebench-1.0.1, pts/postmark-1.1.0, pts/stream-1.2.0, pts/network-loopback-1.0.1, pts/npb-1.2.1, pts/cachebench-1.0.0, pts/john-the-ripper-1.5.1, pts/compress-7zip-1.6.0, pts/c-ray-1.1.0, pts/openssl-1.9.0, pts/apache-1.6.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
kernel performance:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: Inspur NF5270M3 v00001, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5 v2/Core, Memory: 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1333MHz Samsung, Disk: 480GB MR ROMB + 12 x 3000GB MR ROMB, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+
OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.5, Kernel: 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313, File-System: ext4
system performance:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: Inspur NF5270M3 v00001, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5 v2/Core, Memory: 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1333MHz Samsung, Disk: 480GB MR ROMB + 12 x 3000GB MR ROMB, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+
OS: RedHatEnterpriseServer 6.5, Kernel: 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313, File-System: ext4
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 205.90 |==================================================
system performance . 204.37 |==================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 324.73 |==================================================
system performance . 325.30 |==================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 195.63 |==================================================
system performance . 188.53 |================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 1398.08 |================================================
system performance . 1435.73 |=================================================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Test: Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 2246.72 |=================================================
system performance . 2169.57 |===============================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 6897.65 |=================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 51.87 |===================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 5564.65 |=================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 128MB - Thread Count: 16
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 184.82 |==================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 8269.59 |=================================================
system performance . 8243.28 |=================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 8131.43 |=================================================
system performance . 8055.50 |=================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 12204.94 |================================================
system performance . 12165.36 |================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 11983.82 |================================================
system performance . 11915.06 |================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 17103.88 |================================================
system performance . 17098.41 |================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 9129.17 |=================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 27.99 |===================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 6084.55 |=================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 94.42 |===================================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Compile
MB/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 1028.85 |=================================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 139.21 |==================================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
MB/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 441.03 |==================================================
7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 52656 |===================================================
system performance . 52107 |==================================================
John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
system performance . 6240 |====================================================
John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: Traditional DES
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
system performance . 6466000 |=================================================
John The Ripper 1.8.0
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
system performance . 127744 |==================================================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 13559.00 |==============================================
system performance . 14009.21 |================================================
OpenSSL 1.0.1g
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 1706.10 |================================================
system performance . 1730.67 |=================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: BT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 1203.91 |==========================================
system performance . 1406.28 |=================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 534.21 |==================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: FT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 957.29 |==================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 4753.65 |=================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: SP.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
system performance . 811.09 |==================================================
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
kernel performance . 3713 |=================================================
system performance . 3968 |====================================================
SQLite 3.8.10.2
Test Target: Default Test Directory
Seconds < Lower Is Better
kernel performance . 10.21 |===================================================
system performance . 10.04 |==================================================
Loopback TCP Network Performance
Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback
Seconds < Lower Is Better
kernel performance . 21.48 |==================================================
system performance . 21.78 |===================================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
kernel performance . 14.96 |===================================================
system performance . 14.95 |===================================================
Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
kernel performance . 81.92 |===================================================