Mesa 10.2 Ubuntu 14.10

Running pts/openarena-1.5.2, pts/tesseract-1.1.0, pts/unvanquished-1.5.0, pts/warsow-1.5.1, pts/xonotic-1.3.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1409108-PTS-MESA102U84.

Mesa 10.2 Ubuntu 14.10ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionMesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-develIntel Core i7-5960X @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores)Gigabyte X99-UD4-CFIntel Haswell-E DMI216384MB128GB Crucial_CT128MX1Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6870 1024MBIntel Wellsburg HD AudioSyncMasterIntel ConnectionUbuntu 14.103.16.0-14-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.3.1X Server 1.15.1radeon 7.4.03.3 Mesa 10.2.6 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.9.1ext42560x16003.3 Mesa 10.4.0-devel (git-d64ca0a 2014-09-10 utopic-oibaf-ppa) Gallium 0.4OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveGraphics Details- EXA

Mesa 10.2 Ubuntu 14.10openarena: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 2560 x 1600unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Intermediatewarsow: 2560 x 1600xonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Highxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultraxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - UltimateMesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel157.77129.6494.694.50100.90128.1090.0461.57161.23130.3194.3396.27127.7289.8363.93OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Mesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel4080120160200SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.53, N = 3157.77161.23MIN: 2 / MAX: 239MIN: 2 / MAX: 182

OpenArena

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeMesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel714212835Min: 2 / Avg: 6.32 / Max: 35Min: 2 / Avg: 6.14 / Max: 34

Tesseract

Resolution: 1920 x 1080

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Mesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel306090120150SE +/- 0.78, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3129.64130.31

Tesseract

Resolution: 2560 x 1600

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1600Mesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel20406080100SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 394.6994.33

Unvanquished

Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Intermediate

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.26.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: IntermediateMesa 10.2.61.01252.0253.03754.055.0625SE +/- 0.00, N = 34.50

Warsow

Resolution: 2560 x 1600

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 2560 x 1600Mesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel20406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3100.9096.27

Xonotic

Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: High

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: HighMesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel306090120150SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.76, N = 3128.10127.72MIN: 13 / MAX: 255MIN: 22 / MAX: 256

Xonotic

Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: Ultra

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltraMesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel20406080100SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 390.0489.83MIN: 7 / MAX: 180MIN: 10 / MAX: 174

Xonotic

Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltimateMesa 10.2.6Mesa 10.4-devel1428425670SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 361.5763.93MIN: 10 / MAX: 135MIN: 22 / MAX: 132

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4