2014-09-08-1553

2 x Intel Xeon X5355 testing with a Sun SUN FIRE X4150 and ASPEED ASPEED Family on CentOS Linux 7.0.1406 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1409081-KH-20140908154
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
sf-cloud-nocache
September 08 2014
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

2014-09-08-1553 2 x Intel Xeon X5355 testing with a Sun SUN FIRE X4150 and ASPEED ASPEED Family on CentOS Linux 7.0.1406 via the Phoronix Test Suite. sf-cloud-nocache: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon X5355 @ 2.67GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Sun SUN FIRE X4150, Chipset: Intel 5000P MCH, Memory: 16 x 2048 MB DDR2-667MHz Qimonda 72T256520HFD3SB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 840 + 730GB Logical Volume + 146GB Logical Volume, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel 80003ES2LAN Gigabit OS: CentOS Linux 7.0.1406, Kernel: 3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.2 20140120, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 AIO-Stress 0.21 Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 854.22 |==================================================== SQLite 3.7.3 12,500 INSERTs Seconds < Lower Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 29.20 |===================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 253.03 |==================================================== Dbench 4.0 12 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 1359.48 |=================================================== Dbench 4.0 48 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 1231.57 |=================================================== Dbench 4.0 128 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 1014.47 |=================================================== Dbench 4.0 1 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 211.01 |==================================================== IOzone 3.405 8GB Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 2111.75 |=================================================== IOzone 3.405 8GB Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 230.02 |==================================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 4084.89 |=================================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 8.75 |====================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 610.35 |==================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 110.51 |==================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 274.38 |==================================================== Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 Seconds < Lower Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 14.07 |===================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 2094 |====================================================== Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 20.12 |===================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.7 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better sf-cloud-nocache . 5512.07 |===================================================