Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.1, pts/fio-1.4.0, pts/sqlite-1.8.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.0, pts/dbench-1.0.0, pts/iozone-1.8.0, pts/tiobench-1.2.0, pts/compilebench-1.0.1, pts/unpack-linux-1.0.0, pts/postmark-1.1.0, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0, pts/pgbench-1.4.0, pts/apache-1.6.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1408256-KH-MERGE106399
Meebox Cloud node9
Running pts/aio-stress-1.1.1, pts/fio-1.4.0, pts/sqlite-1.8.0, pts/fs-mark-1.0.0, pts/dbench-1.0.0, pts/iozone-1.8.0, pts/tiobench-1.2.0, pts/compilebench-1.0.1, pts/unpack-linux-1.0.0, pts/postmark-1.1.0, pts/compress-gzip-1.1.0, pts/pgbench-1.4.0, pts/apache-1.6.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
U14.04:
Processor: 4 x QEMU Virtual (cpu64-rhel6) @ 2.00GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Red Hat KVM, Chipset: Red Hat Virtio, Memory: 1 x 8192 MB RAM, Disk: 197GB, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446, Network: Red Hat Virtio device
OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-34-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.2, File-System: ext3, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: QEMU
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2:
Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz (1 Core), Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 50GB
OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.14.1-031401-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.2, File-System: ext4, System Layer: Xen 4.2.amazon Hypervisor
QEMU Virtual:
Processor: QEMU Virtual @ 2.00GHz (1 Core), Motherboard: Red Hat KVM, Chipset: Red Hat Virtio, Memory: 1 x 3750 MB RAM, Disk: 197GB, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446, Network: Red Hat Virtio device
OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 3.13.0-34-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.2, File-System: ext3, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: QEMU
Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
QEMU Virtual . 48.27 |=========================================================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Test: Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
U14.04 . 270.92 |==============================================================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 1777.33 |=========================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 2008.45 |==============================================
Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 50.60 |================================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 33.31 |================================
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 319 |==================================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 170 |===========================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 30.47 |========
QEMU Virtual .......... 184.93 |===============================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 27.81 |================================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 26.38 |==============================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Compile
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 34.02 |=======================
QEMU Virtual .......... 72.22 |================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Write - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 9.84 |=================================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 4.96 |=========================
Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Read - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 2.80 |
QEMU Virtual .......... 548.01 |===============================================
IOzone 3.405
8GB Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 27.59 |============
QEMU Virtual .......... 105.59 |===============================================
IOzone 3.405
8GB Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 34.86 |===================
QEMU Virtual .......... 89.57 |================================================
Dbench 4.0
1 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 77.58 |================================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 35.61 |======================
Dbench 4.0
128 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 76.47 |================================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 69.78 |============================================
Dbench 4.0
48 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 109.25 |===============================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 103.40 |============================================
Dbench 4.0
12 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 124.29 |===============================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 84.59 |================================
FS-Mark 3.3
1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 35.13 |=====================
QEMU Virtual .......... 79.02 |================================================
SQLite 3.7.3
12,500 INSERTs
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 113.55 |===============================================
QEMU Virtual .......... 106.50 |============================================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 . 40.40 |======
QEMU Virtual .......... 316.71 |===============================================