probe1
Running pts/scimark2-1.2.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E312xx -  - Red Hat OpenStack Nova: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon E312xx @ 2.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Red Hat OpenStack Nova, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 60GB

	OS: CentOS 6.5, Kernel: 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), File-System: ext4

Intel Xeon E312xx: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon E312xx @ 2.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Red Hat OpenStack Nova, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 60GB

	OS: CentOS 6.5, Kernel: 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313, File-System: ext4


PyBench 2008-08-14
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx -  - Red Hat OpenStack Nova . 3542 |=========================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx -  - Red Hat OpenStack Nova . 7117.17 |======================


AIO-Stress 0.21
Test: Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx -  - Red Hat OpenStack Nova . 574.76 |=======================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx . 926.96 |===================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx . 220.00 |===================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx . 298.17 |===================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx . 1600.92 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx . 1638.71 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E312xx . 758.16 |===================================================