CompuLab Utilite Quad-Core ARM vs. Fit-PC2 Atom

Testing by Michael Larabel of Phoronix of the different CompuLab devices... More benchmarks coming this is just a teaser.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1401249-PL-ATOMARM5943
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 2 Tests
Chess Test Suite 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 11 Tests
CPU Massive 14 Tests
Creator Workloads 6 Tests
Encoding 4 Tests
Fortran Tests 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 4 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 7 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 4 Tests
Server 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 5 Tests
Single-Threaded 5 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
CompuLab Utilite
January 23 2014
 
CompuLab Fit-PC2
January 23 2014
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

CompuLab Utilite Quad-Core ARM vs. Fit-PC2 Atom Testing by Michael Larabel of Phoronix of the different CompuLab devices... More benchmarks coming this is just a teaser. CompuLab Utilite: Processor: ARMv7 rev 10 @ 1.00GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Compulab CM-FX6, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 32GB SanDisk SSD U100, Graphics: GC2000 Engine, Network: Intel I211 Gigabit Connection OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.0.35-cm-fx6-5.1 (armv7l), Desktop: GNOME 3.2.1, Display Server: X Server 1.11.3, OpenGL: 2.1, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 CompuLab Fit-PC2: Processor: Intel Atom Z530 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Intel SBC-FITPC2, Chipset: Intel Hub + SCH, Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 160GB Hitachi HTS54501, Graphics: Intel Hub (SCH Poulsbo), Audio: Realtek ALC260, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168B + Ralink RT3090 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.8.0-29-generic (i686), Display Driver: modesetting 0.7.0, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 127979 |================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 197936 |==================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 62.15 |========================= CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 128.86 |==================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 49.80 |===================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 48.11 |=================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 16.57 |===================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 16.15 |==================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 52.73 |================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 156.46 |==================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 67.53 |======================= CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 153.00 |==================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 124.12 |======================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 270.60 |==================================================== Crafty 23.4 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 0.11 |====================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.03 |=============== CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 4.63 |====================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 1486.55 |=================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1447.70 |================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 1438.23 |================================================= CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1506.41 |=================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 1652.73 |================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1672.49 |=================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 1678.17 |=================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1670.97 |=================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.0 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 56.82 |===================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 56.70 |===================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 128.79 |================================================= CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 135.49 |==================================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 109.12 |==================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 104.05 |================================================== HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 2.01655 |=================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.82762 |===================== HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 0.24977 |=================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.18720 |====================================== HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 0.56971 |=================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.44101 |======================================= HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 0.08971 |======================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.11404 |=================================================== HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 0.51484 |=============================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.85012 |=================================================== HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 0.00162 |=================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.00043 |============== HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 4.32837 |========================= CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 8.75824 |=================================================== HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 0.14196 |================================ CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 0.22299 |=================================================== HPC Challenge 1.4.3 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 711.96 |==================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 521.51 |====================================== Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 578.60 |==================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 325.91 |============================= FFTE 5.0 Test: N=64, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 387.34 |==================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 287.68 |======================================= N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 246.59 |==================================================== Primesieve 4.2 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 1382.41 |=============================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 2264.13 |=================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 390.00 |=========================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 473.04 |==================================================== x264 2014-01-09 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 9.06 |====================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 630.47 |================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 1823.45 |=================================================== FFmpeg 2.1.1 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 357.63 |==================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 1419 |============================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 2559 |====================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.7 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 2512.24 |=================================================== OpenSSL 1.0.1f RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 16.60 |===================================================== PolyBench-C 3.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 24.53 |========================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 30.88 |===================================================== PolyBench-C 3.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 24.59 |========================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 31.22 |===================================================== PolyBench-C 3.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 571.48 |==================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 485.77 |============================================ Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better CompuLab Utilite . 102.70 |==================================================== CompuLab Fit-PC2 . 86.34 |============================================