ubuntu1204_raid10_cachecade-raid0__ext4_noatime
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 testing with a Dell 0GFKVD and Matrox s G200eR2 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz (40 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 0GFKVD, Chipset: Intel Ivytown DMI2, Memory: 24 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MHz, Disk: 299GB PERC H710P + 2399GB PERC H710P, Graphics: Matrox s G200eR2, Network: Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2

	OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.11.0-14-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 640x480


AIO-Stress 0.21
Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1885.84 |=================================


Flexible IO Tester 1.57
Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern
Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 313.74 |==================================


SQLite 3.7.3
12,500 INSERTs
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5.53 |====================================


FS-Mark 3.3
1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 510.93 |==================================


Dbench 4.0
12 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4793.02 |=================================


Dbench 4.0
48 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7604.92 |=================================


Dbench 4.0
128 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4890.17 |=================================


Dbench 4.0
1 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 810.29 |==================================


IOzone 3.405
8GB Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5505.83 |=================================


IOzone 3.405
8GB Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 300.59 |==================================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Read - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12637.40 |================================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Write - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 16.13 |===================================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Compile
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1216.39 |=================================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 262.20 |==================================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
MB/s > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 640.41 |==================================


Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 9.39 |====================================


PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3886 |====================================


Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.50 |===================================


Apache Benchmark 2.4.7
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
PERC H710P - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 17675.61 |================================