nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig
VMware testing on Ubuntu 13.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon X5560 @ 2.79GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX, Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 54GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3

	OS: Ubuntu 13.04, Kernel: 3.8.0-19-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.7, File-System: ext4, System Layer: VMware


Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 12.52 |============================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 119.71 |===========================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 67.41 |============================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Write - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 93.07 |============================


Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Compile
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 147.88 |===========================


Dbench 4.0
12 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 637.61 |===========================


Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3
64MB Random Read - 32 Threads
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 7202.33 |==========================


Dbench 4.0
48 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 552.62 |===========================


Dbench 4.0
128 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 600.59 |===========================


Dbench 4.0
1 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 231.38 |===========================


Flexible IO Tester 1.57
Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern
Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 95.56 |============================


FS-Mark 3.3
1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 83.27 |============================


IOzone 3.405
8GB Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 110.69 |===========================


IOzone 3.405
8GB Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 107.86 |===========================


PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 3768 |=============================


SQLite 3.7.3
12,500 INSERTs
Seconds < Lower Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 52.58 |============================


PostgreSQL pgbench 8.4.11
TPC-B Transactions Per Second
TPS > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 2351.32 |==========================


AIO-Stress 0.21
Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 153.64 |===========================


Gzip Compression
2GB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
nfs to dual 6 disk raidz2 pool over 10gig . 16.35 |============================