NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Windows vs. Linux Overclocked AMD FX-8350 to 4.5GHz testing Windows 8.1 Pro versus Ubuntu 13.10 with Xfce. Using same hardware on both platforms and the latest binary drivers from NVIDIA for the GTX TITAN. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1311243-SO-NVIDIAGEF02&export=pdf&gru&rdt&rro .
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Windows vs. Linux Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core @ 4.52GHz (8 Cores) ASUS Crosshair V Formula AMD RD890 bridge 8192MB 64GB OCZ AGILITY NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN 6144MB (575/3004MHz) Realtek ALC889 Intel 82583V Gigabit Connection Ubuntu 13.10 3.11.0-13-generic (x86_64) Xfce 4.10 X Server 1.14.3 NVIDIA 331.20 4.3.0 GCC 4.8 ext4 2560x1600 AMD64 Family 21 Model 2 Stepping 0 AuthenticAMD (8 Cores) 40GB Windows NT 6.2 (x86_64) OpenBenchmarking.org
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Windows vs. Linux unigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 unigine-heaven: 2560 x 1600 unigine-sanctuary: 1920 x 1080 unigine-sanctuary: 2560 x 1600 unigine-tropics: 1920 x 1080 unigine-tropics: 2560 x 1600 unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 unigine-valley: 2560 x 1600 xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - High xonotic: 2560 x 1600 - High xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra xonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultra xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimate xonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultimate gputest: GiMark - 2560 x 1600 gputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1600 gputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1600 gputest: TessMark - 2560 x 1600 gputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1600 gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1600 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 82.11 40.81 310.04 187.57 217.01 155.36 77.45 46.83 259.22 255.45 234.25 229.09 170.20 162.08 8310 55605 3176 11892 594 1425 80.96 40.10 300.71 184.90 233.78 153.26 84.62 48.99 188.89 187.95 173.85 173.66 130.85 129.14 7732 56540 3213 12695 624 1504 OpenBenchmarking.org
Unigine Heaven Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 80.96 82.11
Unigine Heaven Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 40.10 40.81
Unigine Sanctuary Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Sanctuary 2.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 300.71 310.04
Unigine Sanctuary Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Sanctuary 2.3 Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 184.90 187.57
Unigine Tropics Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Tropics 1.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 233.78 217.01
Unigine Tropics Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Tropics 1.3 Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 153.26 155.36
Unigine Valley Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 84.62 77.45
Unigine Valley Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 48.99 46.83
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.7 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.57, N = 3 SE +/- 1.96, N = 3 188.89 259.22 MIN: 77 / MAX: 500 MIN: 141 / MAX: 608
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.7 Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: High Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.90, N = 3 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 187.95 255.45 MIN: 88 / MAX: 492 MIN: 137 / MAX: 567
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.7 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.92, N = 3 SE +/- 0.90, N = 3 173.85 234.25 MIN: 93 / MAX: 456 MIN: 124 / MAX: 538
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.7 Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: Ultra Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 173.66 229.09 MIN: 94 / MAX: 400 MIN: 117 / MAX: 491
Xonotic Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.7 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 130.85 170.20 MIN: 26 / MAX: 413 MIN: 32 / MAX: 498
Xonotic Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.7 Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 129.14 162.08 MIN: 26 / MAX: 357 MIN: 28 / MAX: 412
GpuTest Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.6.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 60.35, N = 3 SE +/- 69.31, N = 3 7732 8310
GpuTest Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.6.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 8.14, N = 3 SE +/- 7.22, N = 3 56540 55605
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.6.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 20.74, N = 3 SE +/- 19.97, N = 3 3213 3176
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.6.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 38.89, N = 3 SE +/- 51.72, N = 3 12695 11892
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.6.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 8.50, N = 3 SE +/- 7.88, N = 3 624 594
GpuTest Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.6.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 Windows 8.1 Pro x64 Ubuntu 13.10 x86_64 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.91, N = 3 SE +/- 6.17, N = 3 1504 1425
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5