liangzi-ssddisk

Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 testing with a Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF v0123456789 and Matrox s MGA G200eW WPCM450 on CentOS 6.4 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1310287-LUHU-131025242
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Bioinformatics 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 5 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 11 Tests
Creator Workloads 5 Tests
Cryptography 3 Tests
Disk Test Suite 6 Tests
Encoding 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 2 Tests
Java 3 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 5 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Raytracing 2 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 2 Tests
Server 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 4 Tests
Single-Threaded 9 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per RAM Channel Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
October 25 2013
 
Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405
October 27 2013
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

liangzi-ssddisk Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 testing with a Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF v0123456789 and Matrox s MGA G200eW WPCM450 on CentOS 6.4 via the Phoronix Test Suite. SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (12 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF v0123456789, Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 3 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333MHz Samsung, Disk: 64GB SAMSUNG SSD 830, Graphics: Matrox s MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Intel 82574L Gigabit Connection OS: CentOS 6.4, Kernel: 2.6.32-358.14.2.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313, File-System: ext4 Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405: Processor: Intel Xeon E5405 @ 1.99GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Lenovo DPX1066RK, Chipset: Intel 5000V MCH, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB DDR2-667MHz Hynix, Disk: 147GB Seagate ST3146855SS, Graphics: AMD ATI ES1000 128MB, Network: Intel 80003ES2LAN Gigabit OS: CentOS 6.4, Kernel: 3.11.0-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 AIO-Stress 0.21 Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 589.71 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 83.08 |==== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 24.42 |====================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 34.33 |=============================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 63.52 |================ Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 117.28 |============================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 362.53 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 110.49 |========= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 134.37 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 80.39 |================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 400.52 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 131.84 |========== Dbench 4.0 12 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 241.89 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 78.68 |========== Dbench 4.0 48 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 354.61 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 130.41 |=========== Dbench 4.0 128 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 319.22 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 153.35 |============== Dbench 4.0 1 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 61.45 |=============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 25.98 |============= dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 113.13 |======================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 142.20 |============================== FFmpeg 2.0 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 21.28 |========== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 69.35 |=============================== Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 83.69 |= Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 2141.60 |============================= GnuPG 1.4.10 1GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 16.30 |=================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 25.96 |=============================== Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 23.10 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 23.83 |=============================== IOzone 3.405 8GB Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 5466.20 |============================= Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 153.24 |= IOzone 3.405 8GB Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 152.16 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 117.78 |======================= Java SciMark 2.0 FFT Performance Mflops > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 583.09 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 390.17 |==================== Java SciMark 2.0 SOR Performance Mflops > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 840.91 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 786.67 |============================ Java SciMark 2.0 Composite Performance Mflops > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 895.37 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 659.05 |====================== Java SciMark 2.0 Monte Carlo Performance Mflops > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 462.01 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 327.98 |===================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 26.72 |========================= Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 32.79 |=============================== LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 178.84 |======== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 639.92 |============================== Minion 0.15 Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 163.15 |============================ Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 174.69 |============================== Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 894.49 |============================ Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 975.46 |============================== OpenSSL 1.0.1c RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 61.97 |=============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 43.10 |====================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 9.42 |============ Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 23.87 |=============================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 2884 |================================ Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 883 |========== POV-Ray 3.6.1 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 1397 |=========================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 1648 |================================ PyBench 2008-08-14 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 4984 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 5288 |================================ SQLite 3.7.3 12,500 INSERTs Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 146.51 |============ Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 353.43 |============================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 60.04 |========================= Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 73.48 |=============================== Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 3.70 |================================ Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 6656.91 |============================= Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 503.04 |== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 146.40 |============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 97.81 |==================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 5928.90 |============================= Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 499.89 |== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 60.67 |=============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 3.23 |== Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 22.93 |=== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 206.61 |============================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 7.72 |===== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 50.23 |=============================== Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 Seconds < Lower Is Better SAMSUNG SSD 830 - Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 . 16.20 |=============================== Seagate ST3146855SS - Intel Xeon E5405 . 16.13 |===============================