ARMv7 rev 10 testing on Linaro 12.05 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1303266-AR-NITROGEN654
nitrogen6x,
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"fs-mark-01-test1-1mb",3.4,3.6,3.3,3.6,3.4,3.5
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync",
Higher Results Are Better
"fs-mark-01-test2-1mb-no-sync",4,4.3,4.3,4.1,4.5,4.5
"FS-Mark 3.3 - Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size",
Higher Results Are Better
"fs-mark-01-test4-1m-32-sub-dirs",3.5,3.4,3.5
"CacheBench - Test: Read",
Higher Results Are Better
"cachebench-01",1438.346599,1440.32623,1444.212638
"CacheBench - Test: Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"cachebench-01",2055.693656,2051.105785,1996.960171
"CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write",
Higher Results Are Better
"cachebench-01",2116.464925,2115.703916,2114.131794
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-4k-512m-rw",4.5380859375,4.6123046875,4.4150390625
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-4k-512m-rw",302.64453125,331.43359375,325.7568359375,342.4990234375,367.5771484375,351.7392578125
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-4k-2g-rw",4.666015625,4.7275390625,4.6767578125
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-4k-2g-rw",7.5625,7.625,7.9228515625
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-4k-4g-rw",4.705078125,4.740234375,4.7001953125
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-4k-4g-rw",7.0341796875,7.0224609375,7.1240234375
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-64k-512m-rw",4.568359375,4.5166015625,4.5400390625
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-64k-512m-rw",241.7275390625,426.78125,422.087890625,457.5595703125,336.82421875,272.44140625
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-64k-2g-rw",4.64453125,4.6845703125,4.654296875
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-64k-2g-rw",7.529296875,8.0224609375,7.890625
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-64k-4g-rw",4.49609375,4.580078125,4.5751953125
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-64k-4g-rw",6.2314453125,6.1328125,6.4033203125
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-1m-512m-rw",4.404296875,4.4921875,4.623046875
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-1m-512m-rw",339.0810546875,301.9619140625,343.205078125,316.65625,320.5185546875,335.263671875
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-1m-2g-rw",4.662109375,4.666015625,4.62109375
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-1m-2g-rw",8.0810546875,8.0283203125,7.6494140625
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-1m-4g-rw",4.642578125,4.7373046875,4.6552734375
"IOzone 3.405 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance",
Higher Results Are Better
"iozone-1m-4g-rw",7.2412109375,7.103515625,7.20703125
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point",
Higher Results Are Better
"ramspeed-01",
"Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Copy",
Higher Results Are Better
"stream-01",1089.7657,1079.0074,1105.7739,1096.0486,1083.4933,1080.7538,1103.5283,1109.8336,1106.3116,1085.737
"Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Scale",
Higher Results Are Better
"stream-01",1052.3497,1039.5047,1045.0978,1061.1104,1062.631,1035.9344,1046.8748,1061.5048,1072.0694,1068.1958
"Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Add",
Higher Results Are Better
"stream-01",1106.0928,1092.6698,1094.4934,1086.2907,1120.9472,1117.6304,1059.4631,1112.0866,1089.2764,1097.3211
"Stream 2009-04-11 - Type: Triad",
Higher Results Are Better
"stream-01",1102.6096,1098.0752,1092.4741,1082.4942,1117.5994,1097.9973,1085.6814,1123.4116,1090.1611,1082.6921
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-01",49.33,49,48.91,49.01
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-01",12.93,12.96,12.67,12.81
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-01",90.81,90.38,90.81,90.81
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-01",64.84,63.61,63.01,63.31
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-01",33.95,34.04,33.95,33.95
"SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization",
Higher Results Are Better
"scimark2-01",44.12,43.98,44.12,44.18
"FFmpeg 1.1 - H.264 HD To NTSC DV",
Lower Results Are Better
"ffmpeg-01",399.24927592278,407.71926212311,388.40841603279