DRDB

2 x Intel Xeon E5606 testing with a Dell 00NH4P and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Linux via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1303124-FO-AUTOCOMPA81

Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Only show results where is faster than

Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

DRDB 2 x Intel Xeon E5606 testing with a Dell 00NH4P and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Linux via the Phoronix Test Suite. Using both nodes: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5606 @ 2.13GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 00NH4P, Chipset: Intel 5520 I/O + ICH9, Memory: 24576MB, Disk: 67GB PERC H700 + 1933GB PERC H700, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: matrox, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4 Failed to one node: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5606 @ 2.13GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 00NH4P, Chipset: Intel 5520 I/O + ICH9, Memory: 24576MB, Disk: 67GB PERC H700 + 1933GB PERC H700, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: matrox, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4 LVM both nodes: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5606 @ 2.13GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Dell 00NH4P, Chipset: Intel 5520 I/O + ICH9, Memory: 24576MB, Disk: 67GB PERC H700 + 1933GB PERC H700, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: matrox, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4 myiozone #2: Processor: 8 x Intel Xeon E5606 @ 2.13GHz (1 Core), Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 27GB OS: CentOS 5.5 (Final), Kernel: 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5xen (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.1.2 20080704, File-System: ext3, Screen Resolution: 800x600, System Layer: Xen 3.1.2-194.17.4.el5 Hypervisor myiozone #1: Processor: Intel Xeon E5606 @ 2.13GHz (8 Cores), Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 28GB OS: Ubuntu 10.04, Kernel: 2.6.32-28-server (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.3, File-System: ext3, Screen Resolution: 800x600, System Layer: Xen 3.4.3 Hypervisor 2012-08-30 15:28: Processor: Intel Xeon E5606 @ 2.13GHz (1 Core), Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 28GB OS: Ubuntu 10.04, Kernel: 2.6.32-28-server (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.3, File-System: ext3, Screen Resolution: 800x600, System Layer: Xen 3.4.3 Hypervisor 2012-08-30 17:29: Processor: Intel Xeon E5606 @ 2.13GHz (1 Core), Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 27GB OS: CentOS 5.5 (Final), Kernel: 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5xen (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.1.2 20080704, File-System: ext3, Screen Resolution: 800x600, System Layer: Xen 3.1.2-194.17.4.el5 Hypervisor Seagate ST31000524NS: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5606 @ 2.13GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X8DTG-QF, Chipset: Intel 5520 I/O + ICH10R, Memory: 6 x 4096 MB Flash-1066MHz Hyundai, Disk: 1000GB Seagate ST31000524NS + 7 x 3001GB Western Digital WD30EFRX-68A, Graphics: NVIDIA GF100 [Tesla C2050 / C2070], Audio: NVIDIA GPU 10 HDMI/DP, Network: Intel 82574L Gigabit Connection OS: openSUSE 12.2 (x86_64), Kernel: 3.4.33-2.24-desktop (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.7, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better myiozone #2 .......... 156.06 |================================================ myiozone #1 .......... 94.45 |============================= 2012-08-30 15:28 ..... 87.97 |=========================== 2012-08-30 17:29 ..... 156.93 |================================================ Seagate ST31000524NS . 112.68 |================================== IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better myiozone #2 .......... 103.84 |== myiozone #1 .......... 114.64 |== 2012-08-30 15:28 ..... 121.13 |== 2012-08-30 17:29 ..... 102.64 |= Seagate ST31000524NS . 3230.10 |=============================================== Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Using both nodes ... 17.03 |=================================================== Failed to one node . 16.88 |=================================================== AIO-Stress 0.21 Random Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 1672.93 |=============================================== Failed to one node ... 1677.64 |=============================================== Seagate ST31000524NS . 1559.11 |============================================ PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 2812 |=============================================== Failed to one node ... 2986 |================================================== LVM both nodes ....... 220 |==== Seagate ST31000524NS . 2746 |============================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Write - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 2.10 |================== Failed to one node ... 2.11 |================== LVM both nodes ....... 5.96 |================================================== Seagate ST31000524NS . 4.34 |==================================== Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 64MB Random Read - 32 Threads MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 12636.76 |============================================= Failed to one node ... 12915.44 |============================================== LVM both nodes ....... 23.00 | Seagate ST31000524NS . 11221.16 |======================================== Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern Seconds (Run Time) < Lower Is Better Using both nodes ..... 3673.70 |=============================================== Failed to one node ... 3708.43 |=============================================== Seagate ST31000524NS . 2231.24 |============================ FS-Mark 3.3 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ... 61.90 |=============== Failed to one node . 204.48 |================================================== Dbench 4.0 128 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 1062.24 |============================= Failed to one node ... 1737.41 |=============================================== Seagate ST31000524NS . 70.02 |== Dbench 4.0 48 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 1004.65 |===================== Failed to one node ... 2209.23 |=============================================== Seagate ST31000524NS . 70.29 |= Dbench 4.0 12 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 554.32 |============== Failed to one node ... 1828.30 |=============================================== Seagate ST31000524NS . 33.04 |= Dbench 4.0 1 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 138.20 |================== Failed to one node ... 366.02 |================================================ LVM both nodes ....... 134.33 |================== Seagate ST31000524NS . 9.14 |= IOzone 3.347 8GB Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 4350.31 |=============================================== Failed to one node ... 4141.64 |============================================= Seagate ST31000524NS . 4090.63 |============================================ IOzone 3.347 8GB Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ..... 162.44 |======================= Failed to one node ... 344.31 |================================================ Seagate ST31000524NS . 264.14 |===================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ... 851.59 |================================================ Failed to one node . 882.45 |================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ... 581.72 |============================================== Failed to one node . 637.73 |================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Using both nodes ... 131.19 |================================================ Failed to one node . 136.72 |================================================== SQLite 3.7.3 12,500 INSERTs Seconds < Lower Is Better Using both nodes ..... 45.68 |== Failed to one node ... 8.10 | LVM both nodes ....... 47.47 |== Seagate ST31000524NS . 1309.87 |===============================================