2 x Intel Xeon E5310 testing with a Supermicro X7DBN and ATI ES1000 128MB on Scientific 6.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1303087-RA-1210265RA32
20121025
2 x Intel Xeon E5310 testing with a Supermicro X7DBN and ATI ES1000 128MB on Scientific 6.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
cuil_baseline:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5310 @ 1.60GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X7DBN, Chipset: Intel 5000P MCH, Memory: 8 x 2048 MB DDR2-667MHz, Disk: 9 x 1000GB SAMSUNG HD103UJ + 2 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1003FBYX-0 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10EACS-00Z, Graphics: ATI ES1000 128MB, Network: Intel 80003ES2LAN Gigabit
OS: Scientific 6.2, Kernel: 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.6 20110731, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5310 @ 1.60GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X7DBN, Chipset: Intel 5000P MCH, Memory: 8 x 2048 MB DDR2-667MHz, Disk: 9 x 1000GB SAMSUNG HD103UJ + 2 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1003FBYX-0 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10EACS-00Z, Graphics: ATI ES1000 128MB, Network: Intel 80003ES2LAN Gigabit
OS: Scientific 6.2, Kernel: 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.6 20110731, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
TSCP 1.81
AI Chess Performance
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 155862 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 155653 |==================================
Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 21.13 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 20.82 |==================================
Crafty 23.4
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline . 210.82 |=======================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 525.31 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 531.47 |==================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 272.61 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 272.49 |==================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 314.82 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 314.53 |==================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 481.91 |================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 519.77 |==================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 922.37 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 922.13 |==================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 631.01 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 628.44 |==================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 19.02 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 19.03 |===================================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 44.28 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 44.23 |===================================
dcraw
RAW To PPM Image Conversion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 173.92 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 174.01 |==================================
Gcrypt Library 1.4.4
CAMELLIA256-ECB Cipher
Microseconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 5473 |====================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 5457 |====================================
Dbench 4.0
Client Count: 1
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 17.93 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 15.63 |===============================
Dbench 4.0
Client Count: 6
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 45.14 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 36.11 |============================
Dbench 4.0
Client Count: 12
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 61.82 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 50.10 |============================
Dbench 4.0
Client Count: 48
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 90.61 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 81.10 |===============================
Dbench 4.0
Client Count: 128
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 93.25 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 86.47 |================================
Dbench 4.0
Client Count: 256
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 83.43 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 77.68 |=================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 30.33 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 21.37 |=========================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 48.93 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 44.40 |================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 29.83 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 21.50 |=========================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 556.87 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 548.73 |==================================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1873.99 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1849.76 |=================================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1908.14 |================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1950.97 |=================================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 2083.48 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 2083.74 |=================================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1599.60 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1493.88 |===============================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1617.17 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1540.59 |===============================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1668.64 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1617.66 |================================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 110.37 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 78.90 |========================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 118.35 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 83.60 |========================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 123.44 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 83.09 |=======================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 107.07 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 79.22 |=========================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 116.53 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 83.66 |========================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 122.62 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 84.73 |=======================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1966.65 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1904.02 |================================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 2039.83 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 2002.72 |================================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 2082.91 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 2030.69 |================================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1668.47 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1540.23 |==============================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1404.40 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1314.07 |===============================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 110.48 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 79.51 |========================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 118.57 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 84.05 |========================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 123.74 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 83.25 |=======================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 104.67 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 77.92 |=========================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 100.72 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 76.38 |==========================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1708.82 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1626.01 |===============================
IOzone 3.405
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 104.90 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 79.60 |==========================
Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 12.46 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 12.85 |===================================
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 504.14 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 502.55 |==================================
Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 7.34 |====================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 7.13 |===================================
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 1404 |====================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 1330 |==================================
LZMA Compression
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 310.68 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 310.55 |==================================
N-Queens 1.0
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 604.90 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 604.81 |==================================
John The Ripper 1.7.9-jumbo-7
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 3242 |====================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 3242 |====================================
AIO-Stress 0.21
Test: Random Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 660.91 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 665.38 |==================================
Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 56.03 |==================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 57.27 |===================================
Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 12.87 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 13.01 |===================================
x264 2012-10-03
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 68.48 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 68.85 |===================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 73.91 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 74.54 |===================================
POV-Ray 3.6.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 2023 |====================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 2020 |====================================
FFmpeg 1.0
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 41.87 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 41.72 |===================================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.3
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 8103.38 |=================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 7943.98 |================================
OpenSSL 1.0.1c
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 34.53 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 34.80 |===================================
Sudokut 0.4
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 89.89 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 90.27 |===================================
GnuPG 1.4.10
1GB File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 31.67 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 31.71 |===================================
Bork File Encrypter 1.4
File Encryption Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 36.07 |===================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 34.48 |=================================
PyBench 2008-08-14
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
cuil_baseline ...................... 6694 |====================================
SAMSUNG HD103UJ - Intel Xeon E5310 . 6683 |====================================