exFAT vs. F2FS File-Systems

F2FS Linux file-system benchmarks against Microsoft exFAT and NTFS file-systems from a USB 3.0 Corsair Flash Voyager. Benchmarking by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1303063-FO-EXFATVSF247
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
exFAT FUSE
March 04 2013
 
NTFS-3G
March 04 2013
 
F2FS
March 06 2013
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


exFAT vs. F2FS File-SystemsOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i5-2520M @ 2.50GHz (4 Cores)HP 161CIntel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM1 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333MHz160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160Intel Gen6 Mobile (1300MHz)IDT 92HD81B1X5Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205Ubuntu 13.043.9.0-rc1 (x86_64)Unity 6.6.0X Server 1.13.2intel 2.21.33.0 Mesa 9.2-devel (git-e291247)GCC 4.7fuseblkF2FS1600x900ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemsScreen ResolutionExFAT Vs. F2FS File-Systems PerformanceSystem Logs- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-cloog-version-check --disable-ppl-version-check --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-cloog-backend=ppl --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-cloog --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-tune=generic -v - exFAT FUSE: DEADLINE / allow_other,blksize=4096,group_id=0,nodev,nosuid,relatime,rw,user_id=0 - NTFS-3G: DEADLINE / allow_other,blksize=4096,group_id=0,nodev,nosuid,relatime,rw,user_id=0 - F2FS: DEADLINE / acl,active_logs=6,background_gc_on,relatime,rw,user_xattr- Disk Scheduler: DEADLINE. Python 2.7.3.

exFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FSResult OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%683%1267%1850%2433%PostMarkCompile BenchFS-MarkCompile BenchFS-MarkD.T.PInitial Create4.F.3.S.D.1.SCompile1.F.1.S

exFAT vs. F2FS File-Systemsfs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizecompilebench: Compilecompilebench: Initial Createpostmark: Disk Transaction PerformanceexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS19.0721.053.711.342921.481.371.270.821218.2717.8319.4412.7099OpenBenchmarking.org

FS-Mark

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB SizeexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS510152025SE +/- 2.46, N = 6SE +/- 0.03, N = 4SE +/- 0.27, N = 319.071.4818.271. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB SizeexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS510152025Min: 14.8 / Avg: 19.07 / Max: 31Min: 1.4 / Avg: 1.48 / Max: 1.5Min: 17.9 / Avg: 18.27 / Max: 18.81. (CC) gcc options: -static

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB SizeexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS510152025SE +/- 0.50, N = 6SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 321.051.3717.831. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB SizeexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS510152025Min: 19.5 / Avg: 21.05 / Max: 22.3Min: 1.3 / Avg: 1.37 / Max: 1.4Min: 17.5 / Avg: 17.83 / Max: 18.11. (CC) gcc options: -static

Compile Bench

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS510152025SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 33.711.2719.44
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS510152025Min: 3.57 / Avg: 3.71 / Max: 3.78Min: 1.26 / Avg: 1.27 / Max: 1.28Min: 19.16 / Avg: 19.44 / Max: 19.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS3691215SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.97, N = 31.340.8212.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS48121620Min: 1.26 / Avg: 1.34 / Max: 1.39Min: 0.73 / Avg: 0.82 / Max: 0.87Min: 10.8 / Avg: 12.7 / Max: 14.02

PostMark

This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS60120180240300SE +/- 11.15, N = 6SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 3.38, N = 329212991. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceexFAT FUSENTFS-3GF2FS50100150200250Min: 236 / Avg: 291.5 / Max: 305Min: 12 / Avg: 12 / Max: 12Min: 95 / Avg: 99.33 / Max: 1061. (CC) gcc options: -O3