1302235-FO-EXYNOS5DU96
Samsung Exynos 5 Dual testing from a Google Nexus 10 running Ubuntu Touch Developer Preview. Benchmarking by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.


OMAP4 PandaBoard ES: 

	Processor: ARMv7 rev 10 @ 1.20GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: OMAP4 Panda board, Memory: 1024MB, Disk: 16GB SD16G, Graphics: Texas Instruments OMAP

	OS: Ubuntu 13.04, Kernel: 3.5.0-218-omap4 (armv7l), Compiler: GCC 4.7, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050


CLOMP 3.3
Static OMP Speedup
Speedup > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 2.06 |===================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: BT.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 444.59 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: CG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 75.65 |==================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: EP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 10.22 |==================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: FT.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 8.78 |===================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: IS.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 0.71 |===================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: LU.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 277.54 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: MG.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 275.57 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: SP.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 226.86 |=================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3
Test / Class: UA.A
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 2.09 |===================================================


LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0
Test: Rhodopsin Protein
Loop Time < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 457.34 |=================================================


FFTE 5.0
Test: N=64, 1D Complex FFT Routine
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 551.30 |=================================================


Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 217.67 |=================================================


Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 92.84 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 82.41 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 74.31 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 18.69 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 74.53 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 76.78 |==================================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 167.72 |=================================================


VP8 libvpx Encoding 1.1.0
vpxenc
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 0.64 |===================================================


x264 2013-01-28
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 4.84 |===================================================


Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 145.55 |=================================================


7-Zip Compression 9.20.1
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 898 |====================================================


Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.8.1-10
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 1469.16 |================================================


C-Ray 1.1
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 716.01 |=================================================


Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 162.49 |=================================================


Primesieve 4.0
1e12 Prime Number Generation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 1850.76 |================================================


Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 2437 |===================================================


FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 46.27 |==================================================


LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 108.49 |=================================================


FFmpeg 1.1
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 352.18 |=================================================


N-Queens 1.0
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 411.91 |=================================================


OpenSSL 1.0.1c
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
OMAP4 PandaBoard ES . 5 |======================================================