F2FS Linux File-System Benchmarks Benchmarks of the new F2FS (Flash Friendly File-System) being introduced in the mainline Linux 3.8 kernel. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com looking initially at F2FS performance compared to Btrfs, EXT4, and other Linux file-systems.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1302181-FO-F2FSFILES24&sro&grr .
F2FS Linux File-System Benchmarks Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution F2FS Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 XFS JFS ReiserFS Intel Core i5-2520M @ 2.50GHz (4 Cores) HP 161C Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM 1 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333MHz 160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160 Intel Gen6 Mobile (1300MHz) IDT 92HD81B1X5 Intel 82579LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 Ubuntu 13.04 3.8.0-999-generic (x86_64) Unity 6.6.0 X Server 1.13.2 intel 2.21.2 3.0 Mesa 9.0.2 GCC 4.7 F2FS 1600x900 btrfs ext4 xfs jfs reiserfs OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-cloog-version-check --disable-ppl-version-check --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-cloog-backend=ppl --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-cloog --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-tune=generic -v Disk Details - F2FS: DEADLINE / acl,active_logs=6,background_gc_on,relatime,rw,user_xattr - Btrfs: DEADLINE / relatime,rw,space_cache,ssd - EXT3: DEADLINE / acl,barrier=1,data=ordered,errors=continue,relatime,rw,user_xattr - EXT4: DEADLINE / data=ordered,relatime,rw - XFS: DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw - JFS: DEADLINE / relatime,rw - ReiserFS: DEADLINE / relatime,rw Processor Details - Scaling Governor: ondemand System Details - Disk Scheduler: DEADLINE. Python 2.7.3.
F2FS Linux File-System Benchmarks postmark: Disk Transaction Performance compilebench: Initial Create compilebench: Compile iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performance dbench: 1 fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size fs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size fio: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern F2FS Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 XFS JFS ReiserFS 1716 58.36 95.68 101.76 227.28 103.17 103.01 242.13 237.89 569.01 93.67 100.90 95.90 364.55 1154 73.40 106.96 101.05 213.98 100.97 101.29 213.66 211.11 165.37 65.17 94.63 66.37 592.07 1229 98.60 101.00 101.17 206.22 101.45 101.02 206.29 207.70 124.76 67.57 94.53 68.73 143.39 1674 109.52 107.13 101.66 236.29 101.93 101.89 235.35 239.71 195.24 78.80 99.60 78.67 101.86 1704 110.90 101.73 102.60 228.79 102.69 103.00 233.45 230.34 157.83 79.80 95.57 81.07 228.27 1573 55.68 92.47 91.50 241.77 94.12 93.48 241.48 241.34 302.34 90.40 100.23 91.53 143.62 1041 46.67 75.85 95.02 224.26 96.01 98.38 221.93 218.47 109.96 50.18 77.00 51.08 155.06 OpenBenchmarking.org
PostMark Disk Transaction Performance OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 SE +/- 10.33, N = 3 SE +/- 9.96, N = 3 SE +/- 4.00, N = 3 SE +/- 55.59, N = 6 SE +/- 8.97, N = 3 SE +/- 10.33, N = 3 1154 1229 1674 1716 1573 1041 1704 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Compile Bench Test: Initial Create OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.91, N = 3 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.91, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 3.60, N = 3 SE +/- 3.33, N = 3 73.40 98.60 109.52 58.36 55.68 46.67 110.90
Compile Bench Test: Compile OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.91, N = 3 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 SE +/- 1.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 1.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.72, N = 3 106.96 101.00 107.13 95.68 92.47 75.85 101.73
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 1.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 101.05 101.17 101.66 101.76 91.50 95.02 102.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 SE +/- 3.28, N = 6 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 1.74, N = 3 213.98 206.22 236.29 227.28 241.77 224.26 228.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 100.97 101.45 101.93 103.17 94.12 96.01 102.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 1.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 101.29 101.02 101.89 103.01 93.48 98.38 103.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.96, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 1.74, N = 3 SE +/- 0.83, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 SE +/- 1.68, N = 3 213.66 206.29 235.35 242.13 241.48 221.93 233.45 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 SE +/- 2.17, N = 3 SE +/- 1.42, N = 3 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 SE +/- 1.68, N = 3 211.11 207.70 239.71 237.89 241.34 218.47 230.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Dbench Client Count: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 1 Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 165.37 124.76 195.24 569.01 302.34 109.96 157.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt
FS-Mark Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.66, N = 6 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 65.17 67.57 78.80 93.67 90.40 50.18 79.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
FS-Mark Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 SE +/- 1.64, N = 6 SE +/- 0.82, N = 3 94.63 94.53 99.60 100.90 100.23 77.00 95.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
FS-Mark Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 SE +/- 0.82, N = 4 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 66.37 68.73 78.67 95.90 91.53 51.08 81.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
Flexible IO Tester Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds (Run Time), Fewer Is Better Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern Btrfs EXT3 EXT4 F2FS JFS ReiserFS XFS 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 4.82, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 592.07 143.39 101.86 364.55 143.62 155.06 228.27
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5