r710.55.w64.r256.cfq.all Running pts/iozone-1.8.0.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1210292-IV-R71055W6459 2012-10-29 17:24 Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon X5690 @ 3.46GHz (12 Cores), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R710, Chipset: Intel 5520 I/O + ICH9, Memory: 6 x 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz, Disk: 600GB PERC H700 + 2 x SSD 910 200GB, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450
OS: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Tikanga, Kernel: 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 (x86_64), Display Driver: matrox, Compiler: GCC 4.1.2, File-System: ext3
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ.
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 27.15, N = 3 3852.26
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.94, N = 6 286.09
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 7.46, N = 3 3663.74
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.20, N = 3 303.66
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 41.56, N = 3 5793.60
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 5.59, N = 3 303.65
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 7.25, N = 4 426.81
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.83, N = 3 261.86
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 2.62, N = 3 4438.78
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.05, N = 3 287.88
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 53.89, N = 3 5565.77
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.11, N = 3 300.66
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 60.42, N = 3 6407.03
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.30, N = 3 304.36
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 9.81, N = 6 444.43
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.70, N = 6 241.56
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 4196.53
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.32, N = 5 289.27
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 182.08, N = 6 4238.00
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.11, N = 5 296.28
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 6.62, N = 3 5333.57
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.93, N = 3 296.53
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 2012-10-29 17:24 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 7.22, N = 6 432.37
2012-10-29 17:24 Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon X5690 @ 3.46GHz (12 Cores), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R710, Chipset: Intel 5520 I/O + ICH9, Memory: 6 x 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz, Disk: 600GB PERC H700 + 2 x SSD 910 200GB, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450
OS: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Tikanga, Kernel: 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 (x86_64), Display Driver: matrox, Compiler: GCC 4.1.2, File-System: ext3
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ.
Testing initiated at 29 October 2012 17:24 by user .